By the way, anyone as over the moon as I was to see Kara Lawson and her predictably intelligent and insightful self covering this game?
I love your first sentence!Kia is the heart and fire of the team and Napheesa is the glue and consistency. That has the potential to be a lethal combination when the time comes against some ranked opponents. Both had really good games on both ends!
Butler's improvements and contributions can't be ignored either. She played extremely well for the most part and her D made a difference for us today. It was really nice to see her get some good minutes to get her settled and hopefully bet the ball rolling for some even bigger improvements down the line. I wouldn't call it a pretty game by any means, but it had it's pretty moments.
Pheesa just doesn't at all remind me of Maya. Maya was poetry in motion, all grace and elegance. Pheesa is a stutter-stepper--really quick twitch reaction, suddenly slicing, deceptively and explosively quick. And she hasn't yet established her outside shot like Maya's--though she well may.Napheesa played a game that Maya Moore would be proud of. Natalie made an indispensable contribution, and Kia was steady, but this was Napheesa's game.
She played at the same level against Florida State, and she hasn't had a bad game against anybody. Before long, if she continues to play at this level, more people will be making the Maya comparison.
There must be something in the water in Jefferson City.Napheesa played a game that Maya Moore would be proud of. Natalie made an indispensable contribution, and Kia was steady, but this was Napheesa's game.
She played at the same level against Florida State, and she hasn't had a bad game against anybody. Before long, if she continues to play at this level, more people will be making the Maya comparison.
Pheesa just doesn't at all remind me of Maya. Maya was poetry in motion, all grace and elegance. Pheesa is a stutter-stepper--really quick twitch reaction, suddenly slicing, deceptively and explosively quick. And she hasn't yet established her outside shot like Maya's--though she well may.
You know Kib - we all get caught up in the stats that get recorded and forget how much of the game isn't measured by standard stats - while I am not a big fan of advanced stats because I think they record numbers that often don't make sense, I think in this game having a 'plus minus' number for Natalie would be very instructive. She didn't score much, she didn't grab every rebound, she didn't hand out a dozen assists (3 isn't bad), or block every shot (2) and she didn't get credit for a steal, but Uconn wasn't playing well when she entered, and they started playing a lot better, and TX was having their way in the paint before she entered, and they found it harder once she was on the floor. I think a plus minus in this game would tell that story. And isn't that really what a badass award is about!
(I don't actually like a lot of 'advanced metrics' in basketball - I think they can be much more misleading than standard stats, and 'tell' stories that just don't make sense. Any individual statistic in a team sport can be misleading but at least for me, standard stats are numbers I am used to adjusting for, while the advanced metrics get into areas that are much harder to 'regularize' to what actually is happening - they hide their own biases so it is harder to understand why they are lying.)
Hey Kib: "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do." (Emerson, "Self-Reliance")
You, sir, have a great soul!
You know Kib - we all get caught up in the stats that get recorded and forget how much of the game isn't measured by standard stats - while I am not a big fan of advanced stats because I think they record numbers that often don't make sense, I think in this game having a 'plus minus' number for Natalie would be very instructive. She didn't score much, she didn't grab every rebound, she didn't hand out a dozen assists (3 isn't bad), or block every shot (2) and she didn't get credit for a steal, but Uconn wasn't playing well when she entered, and they started playing a lot better, and TX was having their way in the paint before she entered, and they found it harder once she was on the floor. I think a plus minus in this game would tell that story. And isn't that really what a badass award is about!
(I don't actually like a lot of 'advanced metrics' in basketball - I think they can be much more misleading than standard stats, and 'tell' stories that just don't make sense. Any individual statistic in a team sport can be misleading but at least for me, standard stats are numbers I am used to adjusting for, while the advanced metrics get into areas that are much harder to 'regularize' to what actually is happening - they hide their own biases so it is harder to understand why they are lying.)