- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
- Messages
- 548
- Reaction Score
- 3,171
You can't start the year 0-2. You can't.
A HUGE difference between the ACC and even Big East/much less AAC is that in ACC country those games have been on network TV forever and are part of culture. When I was in NC mid-90's random ACC games would displace primetime TV/i.e. Seinfeld. So at least in NC its been an entire culture that supports & watches the league consisting of many fan bases. In CT you are simply going after one fan base.
Not to put us in their disgusting company, but it is similar to how BC can't draw any fans now - they get a bump for UNC or Dook, but otherwise their target market is ONLY BC fans b/c there simply isn't a wide swath of college basketball fans (I'd guarantee their 2nd biggest best sales market is fans of other schools). The conference dysfunction has further alienated and eliminated northeast fans of college basketball - its simply easier to know/follow/root for and against local teams and that's been stripped away.
For the first time since Gampel Pavilion opened in 1990, the Huskies did not play to a sellout at either Gampel in Storrs or the XL Center in Hartford.
And it trickled down to the AAC Tournament at the XL Center, where overall attendance was about 27,000, compared to 45,000 in 2014. UConn played three games and drew 20,296, a 6,765 average.
I'm not going to blame the fans. UConn is situated between two large cities with 12 pro sports team to watch. That's competition plain and simple. New England is beautiful with tons of things to do outdoors. More competition. In Memphis you can watch the Grizzlies or take a dip in the Mississippi. In Kentucky, it's a choice between going to Wildcats games or spending "quality time" with your close relatives. The Huskies have to put a good product on the court. If they do people will come to see them. If not, you get this years attendance figures.
So we werent sitting in between 2 large cities with 12 pro sports teams to watch when we were selling out exhibition games vs. Marathon Oil?
Got it.
I doubt the marathon oil full house followed two crappy seasons.
No they didn't.
But there is a sweet spot in between somewhere I think?
Maybe somewhere between selling out an exhibition against a pickup team, and not having a half full house for a conference tournament semi final on your home court on a Saturday at 5 pm?
That Cincinnati showing inexcusable by ALL metrics
I doubt the marathon oil full house followed two crappy seasons.
Sheesh, regardless of any other factors isn't it an inherent truth that Sunday night games are inferior to Saturday or any other day of the week? So my point is you can sell something inferior more easily if you have higher demand.The post said that Sunday night games are inherently bad. Well other leagues have them.
The quality of the AAC isn't any better at noon than it is at 8pm.
And I challenge " 2 crappy seasons"
You want to call a year we won the conference tournament , made the NCAA tourney , and won a game in the tourney a " crappy season" and lump it in with this year? You are proving my point.
Was it up to our usual standards? Especially regular season?
No
But 320 teams in the country would've trade places and embraced that " crappy season"
I get that we aspire to better. We should.
But you need to rethink that definition.
I think one of the things that the athletic department is grappling with, is prioritizing the reasons why attendance dropped.
Personally, I blame the conference schedule as the main reason. There's a growing lack of buzz around the program due to their conference schedule. I know I personally have a hard time justifying going to any home game besides maybe Cincy or SMU, and I feel like a lot of the fan base feels the same way. Weird start times certainly don't help.
yes. well said.in the Big East days, Cincinnati and SMU would have been "ok, not great" match-ups - definitely a warm-up to the main card. Now they're presented to us as the premier games.
'Nough said.
I think having games at Mohegan and/or Bridgeport which are both newer arenas vs. the Dump XL center would also help with attendance for at least a couple games a year.
Our arena situation stinks. Gampel is the best but it's too remote for non-students. Everyone hates Hartford but at least it's close enough that students can still go. Students aren't going to Bridgeport but maybe they can do a weekend game over winter break like they did 3-4 years ago. I attended that game, much easier than making it up to Gampel or Hartford. Mohegan Sun might be doable to bus students down to. That drive is what, 10-15 minutes longer than the drive from Storrs to Hartford? I'm not sure there are enough fans local to Mohegan Sun for it to make sense, it's not like it has the population density of FFC for Bridgeport games.
They may or may not "deserve" support but here is the reality. A bad team playing a mediocre schedule at odd times is going to struggle. Add to this the overall decline in live sports attendance. If UConn went 35-0 the crowds would be back though probably not to 1999 levels. And in fact they were already declining in the later years of Calhouns tenure. You really need to stop the nonsensical blaming of the AAC for everything from UConns poor record to North Koreas nuclear program. It isn't a great league but guess what? We have done little since Year 1 to add to its luster.BullScalito
We are talking about a team who has given us 4 titles in 18 years. They deserved a pass and our support no matter what league we are playing in and how poorly the season was going.
We have multiple years down like this one and I start to buy the conference/performance metric.
Our fan base is made up of pathetic front runners.
This program deserved better from us, if for nothing else, then as thanks for what they have given us previously.
It is clear that many of you guys weren't around in the early days of the Big East. I bought tickets at the box office day of the game for almost every game including the Chris Mullins St Johns team and the Villanova team that won the NCAA title. Here is the thing. In those early days we were Tulane compared to those other guys. Heck we bought tickets to Georgetown in DC from the UConn ticket office and the gave us 2 for half price because we bought 4. They couldn't sell them in those days. It was only AFTER Calhoun started winning that these rivalries developed. If you asked people in the days when UConn played in the infamous 8-9 game at the BET if we were anyone's rival they would have told you "No. Not a rival but if you lost to UConn, the coach would be on the hotseat."The rivalries were fun to take part of, no matter how good or bad Uconn was. Now we've started over with our closest "rival" being Cinncy and maybe SMU.
It is clear that many of you guys weren't around in the early days of the Big East. I bought tickets at the box office day of the game for almost every game including the Chris Mullins St Johns team and the Villanova team that won the NCAA title. Here is the thing. In those early days we were Tulane compared to those other guys. Heck we bought tickets to Georgetown in DC from the UConn ticket office and the gave us 2 for half price because we bought 4. They couldn't sell them in those days. It was only AFTER Calhoun started winning that these rivalries developed. If you asked people in the days when UConn played in the infamous 8-9 game at the BET if we were anyone's rival they would have told you "No. Not a rival but if you lost to UConn, the coach would be on the hotseat."