Attempting to Improve the Game Day Experience is merely one piece of the puzzle | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Attempting to Improve the Game Day Experience is merely one piece of the puzzle

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's also not the full pregame. We are drifting from the main point of needed to fix the details of the overall fan experience. The band is one part, including support for a major college marching band. The band members are consistently the best fans in the stadium and not just for FB. The complaint here is management. There is a space for an entrance we push an entire visiting FB team through it.

As for timing, that is a detail than can and should be addressed again proving my point.

As for that UT clip, that is not their pregame, that is an out of context snipit of a portion of their pregame. Not a very exciting one if you ask me, but it still has more going on than ours.

I go back to if other state flagships can do this, so can UConn. You may not be able to recruit fickle 5 star players from the south to come to Storrs, but you can surely handle the back room stuff the way they do at other schools. Hopefully the new AD feels the same way. Warde, Susan, and BD deserve credit for seeing this, now it's up to continued improvement and execution.

FWIW, PSU's team pulls up to the locker room door in buses. They don't need to do anything else, but it still draws a big crowd. Especially, when there is a question to who will be the starting QB. According to the misses, he sits in the first seat by the door on the first bus. The band marches from their building to the stadium, but that is a necessity. The misses demands that I include that the band didn't have a building when she attended, they only had two trailers. Apparently the band building is less than a decade old. I was referring to the chanting choreographed entrance and the lack of dead air in their performance once they walk in.
 
Last edited:
I know Diaco chose the entrance music for the team the last few years but I would like to see something that will get the team/ stands rockinggggg prior to kickoff. I also think the pre entrance video leading into the song always worked really well. personally im a fan of this song, its New Noise by Refused, its cut up a bit different from the actual song but is a bit more up tempo through the song.
 
The pageantry and tradition of game day is what brings people to the college game. Especially in this age of high quality TV at home. People go to games at Michigan, OSU, ND, PSU because of the spectacle.

I've been to UM and ND. To what spectacle do you refer? My main memory of Michigan is waiting in a 30-minute line just to get to my seat. That was awesome!
 
We are drifting from the main point of need to fix the details of the overall fan experience. The band is one part, including support for a major college marching band. The complaint here is management.

Our new AD emailed me that he knows we have a "lot of work to do with respect to our game day experience, but looking forward to working with people to figure out how we can make improvements."
This will be an incremental process. Don't forget, what makes those spectacles so cool at Penn St and Michigan that you like so much (as do I) is that there's already a long tradition of fan anticipation and reaction--and a stadium chocked full of folks creating tremendous buzz and excitement around the band entrance and all that kinetic movement. But those same pre-games in an empty stadium like ours would fall fall kind of flat and look somewhat silly. Chicken and egg for sure but we don't want to put the band through major revamps all at once. Lets create a solid looking ideal plan and build momentum with each tweak.
 
Exactly, it is CYA, and it's the type of BS work that drives me crazy.

After scanning through the entire document, I think we're looking at a first-meeting "glossy;" the type of thing a sales person representing
a high-end product hands out the first time meeting with a prospective client or customer. Simply? A Sales Brochure.

As has been pointed out, the five bullet points in the "Executive Summary" are high-level items D & T is identifying as needing definition. D & T wants to work with (and charge) the prospect to develop meaningful detail related to expansion and use of data related to each of the points.

If a consultant like D & T provided the above shown brochure as it's conclusion, the resulting homicide would be justified.
 
Our new AD emailed me that he knows we have a "lot of work to do with respect to our game day experience, but looking forward to working with people to figure out how we can make improvements."
This will be an incremental process. Don't forget, what makes those spectacles so cool at Penn St and Michigan that you like so much (as do I) is that there's already a long tradition of fan anticipation and reaction--and a stadium chocked full of folks creating tremendous buzz and excitement around the band entrance and all that kinetic movement. But those same pre-games in an empty stadium like ours would fall fall kind of flat and look somewhat silly. Chicken and egg for sure but we don't want to put the band through major revamps all at once. Lets create a solid looking ideal plan and build momentum with each tweak.
I know you mean well, but you have a long standing stance of being anti anything that involves standing on the concourse and I'm not sure how I feel about that. Reason I say that is making the scoreboard area a full on sports bar atmosphere a la the XL renovation I think would be a huge hit and you'd likely pooh-pooh it before really considering it since it doesn't fit your vision. Hope I'm not being too presumptuous there. It's nice that the AD is soliciting input.
 
.-.
You're right Mike about my natural aversion to folks not being in their seats but as part of an overall improvement in fan participation and a series of "incentives" to have them arrive earlier into the stadium, I'm open to anything. (BTW, I also have an aversion to wedding invitees slipping into the bar to watch "the game" :)).
 
You're right Mike about my natural aversion to folks not being in their seats but as part of an overall improvement in fan participation and a series of "incentives" to have them arrive earlier into the stadium, I'm open to anything. (BTW, I also have an aversion to wedding invitees slipping into the bar to watch "the game" :)).
hey Nos..what is your take on Benedict after exchanging emails with him?
 
You're right Mike about my natural aversion to folks not being in their seats but as part of an overall improvement in fan participation and a series of "incentives" to have them arrive earlier into the stadium, I'm open to anything. (BTW, I also have an aversion to wedding invitees slipping into the bar to watch "the game" :)).
I'm all for straight up bribery - offer 5 random fans in their seats before kickoff $100, something along those lines... Fan loyalty cards that you can swipe before kickoff and towards the end of the 4th quarter that make you eligible for perks ... Anything that gets the job done.
 
I'm all for straight up bribery - offer 5 random fans in their seats before kickoff $100, something along those lines... Fan loyalty cards that you can swipe before kickoff and towards the end of the 4th quarter that make you eligible for perks ... Anything that gets the job done.

I still say fill the building first before you around confronting those fans that paid their cash and are supporting the program just because they aren't conforming to your norms. This is not a big deal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,336
Messages
4,565,417
Members
10,466
Latest member
agiglax


Top Bottom