Army and Navy in Top 25 October 13-14 | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Army and Navy in Top 25 October 13-14

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,865
Reaction Score
38,873
If you’re trying to sell recruits on getting them ready for the next level, the triple option ain’t it. So it’s perfect for them since they seldom get NFL level talent.

And yeah it’s outside the the norm so sorry it’s a system, gimmick offense.

I think this Army’s usual once in a quarter century great season. They will go back to sucking again here shortly.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,796
Reaction Score
14,323
l
The service academies are now most likely to have the most consistency with roster composition and stability.

There's an opportunity for them to hang in the 15-25 range because of the roster stability.
Air Force BB lost 6 guys in the Portal
 

Jetskies

I hope my takes age like milk!
Joined
Oct 18, 2022
Messages
523
Reaction Score
2,462
If you’re trying to sell recruits on getting them ready for the next level, the triple option ain’t it. So it’s perfect for them since they seldom get NFL level talent.

And yeah it’s outside the the norm so sorry it’s a system, gimmick offense.

I think this Army’s usual once in a quarter century great season. They will go back to sucking again here shortly.
almost totally agree here, except the "gimmick" part - the triple option is a legit offense, we should not take that away from it. It's boring and outdated, but it's a legit gameplan.

I feel like in this context, a gimmick is the stupid ahh trick plays UConn was running almost every game under Nick Charlton. A feigned attempt at innovation and deceit - aiming to outsmart the opponent but tripping over your own ankles before he was fooled.
 
Last edited:

UCFBfan

Kings of New England!
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
6,141
Reaction Score
13,580
yes, but military academies always lose players like normal schools do. Calling it "the portal" isn't exactly correct
According to the article, after year two, you need to either commit to your final two years and 5 years of service or not. My guess is that anyone who leaves did so before then.

From the article:
After a student’s second year here, they are required, if they wish to continue, to sign an agreement binding them to complete their junior and senior years, plus five years of active duty. The fine for breaking the agreement is in the six figures. It is an obvious incentive to stay.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
1,562
Reaction Score
3,134
According to the article, after year two, you need to either commit to your final two years and 5 years of service or not. My guess is that anyone who leaves did so before then.

From the article:
if you leave you also owe backpay to the academies for time and tuition
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,865
Reaction Score
38,873
almost totally agree here, except the "gimmick" part - the triple option is a legit offense, we should not take that away from it. It's boring and outdated, but it's a legit gameplan.

I feel like in this context, a gimmick is the stupid ahh trick plays UConn was running almost every game under Nick Charlton. A feigned attempt at innovation and deceit - aiming to outsmart the opponent but tripping over your own ankles before he was fooled.

Gimmick doesn’t mean illegitimate. But it’s definitely a gimmick, particularly back in the day with Navy’s ridiculous chop blocks.
 

UCFBfan

Kings of New England!
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
6,141
Reaction Score
13,580


These might be the coolest helmets ever. They're pairing these with their all blacks this weekend vs Air Force.
 

Online statistics

Members online
342
Guests online
1,938
Total visitors
2,280

Forum statistics

Threads
160,843
Messages
4,240,326
Members
10,096
Latest member
catsfan11


.
Top Bottom