- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 4,793
- Reaction Score
- 9,094
Just curious if the NBD people have been on campus for a 16k football event pre-Rentschler?
Last edited:
Yeah, well it kind of does because suggesting that a football stadium in the middle of a paved parking lot for 100,000 patrons surrounded by other buildings, is somehow violating the "natural surroundings" of a parking lot and other buildings just doesn't make any sense.What ever. All I said is that it dominates the landscape. It does A bowl doesn’t. It has nothing to do with the arrangement of their athletic facilities and I’m sure is fun on game day.
You have to think that coaches, players, and freshman recruits wouldn’t mind just walking to practice or to a game instead of a bumpy 40 min bus ride to Pratt & Whitney Field.Busses means kisses. Buses is the plural of bus. Maybe you also could tell us how many FBS football programs play in a non-pro stadium that is a 40-minute drive from campus.
It's a beautiful thing. Wish we had one, especially full of fans chanting "We are......UConn!) Yes, a Bowl would be prettier though. Have you been to Athens GA? You drive though campus and all of a sudden you see a stadium down there, complete with hedges.Why so defensive? It’s out in the countryside and isn’t all that attractive.
Been to the Big House in Ann Arbor 3 times and being a bowl, you really can’t see it until you get pretty close. VTech stadium doesn’t really stick out either. Yale Bowl originally built for 77000 also doesn’t stick out. My comment had nothing to do with game day atmosphere. I’ve had UConn season’s tickets from when they were still in Storrs and suffered through the last decade plus. Lots of room to spread out.It's a beautiful thing. Wish we had one, especially full of fans chanting "We are......UConn!) Yes, a Bowl would be prettier though. Have you been to Athens GA? You drive though campus and all of a sudden you see a stadium down there, complete with hedges.
I'm sure long range planners already have a number of sites where a stadium could go either on campus or at Depot Campus. Are those train tracks still active and where do they go? I've heard of stories of students getting on a train to New Haven for a trip to Yale Bowl, way back when.
I suspect that the potential competition for concerts and events with the XL center might make that unattractive to the state legislature.If Uconn is to build a stadium in the Northeast make it a domed stadium, and use it as a multi-purpose facility.
Graduations, Concerts, other sports, etc.
That way you can satisfy the Polititions, because it can be used year round for many things.
Can you imagine 40,000 to watch Geno and the women's team?
No the big problem is the Rent is managed by the quasi-public CDRA, that has somehow managed never to make a profit on even a single venture for decades. It's really a staggering record.We would all love to see the Rent used for more concerts, events, sports etc . I looked at Foxboro who just hosted a Stones concert last week. The big difference is Foxboro is privately owned and makes economic decisions that boost the venue. The state of CT has many different stakeholders that aren't always in the best interests of fans and taxpayers.
People complain about traffic leaving Renschler field as well, but as you know well, that's a bigger problem for people rushing out at the end of the third quarter than it is for people who leave after having a beer and a sandwich after the game. People complain about leaving games at Michie stadium at West Point. I've never had an issue, Because I don't struggle to rush out. Instead I'll walk down to the monuments, or often join at y tailgate as a guest of West Point fans. it really doesn't take much time to avoid traffic.
Again, I think the comparison to gamble isn't apples to apples because everyone arrives at practically the same time and everyone leaves at practically the same time.
I can't believe that Storrs CT Is the only place in the world that can't host football games without a limited access highway leading up to the front gate. West Point leverages tailgating, Rutgers leverages smart traffic management techniques, dedicated one direction roads etc. It's eminently "doable" without investing millions in infrastructure for six games a year.
The better question is should we do it, to which my answer is no while Rentschler Field remains a viable alternative and does not need substantial additional investment. That should be true for at least the next 10 years.
Fully agree that isn't to make the case for a new stadium coming off a 3–9 year. Football stadiums have a stated life of 30 years, though after 20 years they require large investment. When it comes time to invest a significant amount of money at the Rent, the state should consider whether that money would be better spent in Storrs. That's probably a debate for 2033 though.Storrs certainly could do it but…
At this point between the rent and playing half our basketball games at xl we’ve conditioned fans to have that convenience factor. So at a time when we are already begging fans to come to football games, telling them to drive further with worse traffic is a tough sell. Staying after for tailgating is certainly more fun than sitting in traffic but it’s still adding to the time commitment factor.
I wish we could go back in time and build on campus. I also think if we ever got back to our peak and the program had some buzz we should be thinking on campus because there certainly are advantages to it. But right now where we’re at I don’t think it would be the right move even if we had the money and could figure out the politics
And not having to pay for environmental remediation likely.Big winner of Rent being built was Pratt & Whitney not having to property tax anymore.
I went to a home game at the Rent, four times in 20 years for a reason. Actually went to more away games.And not having to pay for environmental remediation likely.