Orangutan
South Bend Simian
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2014
- Messages
- 5,878
- Reaction Score
- 26,753
ND moves up to #4 class.
Thanks for the update, was curious about that.
ND moves up to #4 class.
It looks like they will have several point guards; Allen, Johnson, Patberg, and Arike.
Chong and Edwards are not pgsJefferson, Chong, Nurse, Edwards?
Arike is definitely NOT a PG. And taller PGs can play either guard position, but SGs cannot necessarily handle the point. Just like in high school football where the best athlete is often tabbed to play QB, the best guard is oftentimes anointed the PG, even if their best college position is SG.It looks like they will have several point guards; Allen, Johnson, Patberg, and Arike.
It looks like they will have several point guards; Allen, Johnson, Patberg, and Arike.
Arike is definitely NOT a PG. And taller PGs can play either guard position, but SGs cannot necessarily handle the point. Just like in high school football where the best athlete is often tabbed to play QB, the best guard is oftentimes anointed the PG, even if their best college position is SG.
The only place I have seen her listed as a PG is Hoopgurlz. She is called an off guard (G) on Prospects Nation, a G on Blue Star, and a SG on ASGR. On all these sites, point guards are designated PG, not G. She never played the point on the National team either.This is the first place anyone has said Arike is not a point guard. I have seen videos of her, and she looks like one to me.
Sure, point guards can play multiple positions, and improve the ball handling options. However, I think you will see Arike O at PG at ND.
Actually Edwards is. And all the new guards for UCONN can play the 1. Chong did at times last year. I'm betting most of ND's guards are capable of playing the 1 or the 2 as well... Some may be better at it than others, but unless you are a player like Jefferson or Dangerfield, I'm not sure there are too many "pure" 1's out there...Chong and Edwards are not pgs
Chong and Edwards are not pgs
Agreed. Chong and Edwards are much more 1's than 2's. Although I think both can and will/do play the 2.Actually Edwards is. And all the new guards for UCONN can play the 1. Chong did at times last year. I'm betting most of ND's guards are capable of playing the 1 or the 2 as well... Some may be better at it than others, but unless you are a player like Jefferson or Dangerfield, I'm not sure there are too many "pure" 1's out there...
When has Notre Dame said they lost because of injuries? I haven't seen one ND fan ever make such a claim. There have been a few UConn fans on this board that claimed that ND would have had a better chance if they were at full strength, but I hardly think that is a contentious claim.I alays look back 3 or 4 years se what they did....ND a grt school and Muffet is an excellent coach that loves to beat UCONN. Now the shoe has been turned 2 seasons in the biggest games....Can't wait for Dec 6t in SB.......ND has been staying they lost because of injuries last year...Lets see what happens.....
The only place I have seen her listed as a PG is Hoopgurlz. She is called an off guard (G) on Prospects Nation, a G on Blue Star, and a SG on ASGR. On all these sites, point guards are designated PG, not G. She never played the point on the National team either.
PG = 1Agreed. Chong and Edwards are much more 1's than 2's. Although I think both can and will/do play the 2.
Not to sound terribly preachy, but it makes a difference for several reasons.A lot of ink on this Board for someone who announced months ago that she wasn't interested in coming to Connecticut. What difference does it make where she goes? As former tOSU Football Player Matt Wilhem told a recruit on a visit, "come here and play for us or go somewhere else and get beat by us."
I do. They couldn't suck badly enough to satisfy me.
Yea????PG = 1
SG = 2
Yea????