- Joined
- Nov 21, 2012
- Messages
- 4,634
- Reaction Score
- 9,910
Why would any "expert" or any non-UConn fan pick UConn to win it all?Anyone?
Are any of them picking us to beat Kansas?
I was really surprised to see that 1 SI dude pick us to beat KU
Why would any "expert" or any non-UConn fan pick UConn to win it all?Anyone?
Are any of them picking us to beat Kansas?
I have $100 at 60-1I have $200 on us to win at 25:1 - back from October.
If we beat Colorado, I believe we will beat Kansas.Kansas >>>>>>> 2013 Gonzaga, though.
DOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED!
Well, put into context that we have looked that good against another 9 seed--which took us 4OT to beat, a 10-seed, and a team that didn't make the NIT.If we beat Colorado, I believe we will beat Kansas.
I get the record and the stats, but I don't believe Kansas is that good.
They do this every year in the BIG 12 and just about every year they lose early in the tournament.
We are coming on pretty fast and I truly believe our talent is better than the talent who actually plays for them, they might have 1 pro in Selden, the other pros they have don't even make it on the floor.
Again, I am very confident that if we can beat Colorado that we will beat Kansas.
I much happier to see them in the second round IF we make it there than the likes of Michigan St., UNC, Kentucky, Oregon, Virginia, St. Joes, etc.....
No. Wichita State is the only one to make the Final Four as well.Has a 9 seed ever won the championship?
Yes. Only 6 teams land in Synergy's top ten efficiency rankings for both offense and defense (well before high seed and low seeds are split, defensively uconn is one of the best in the tourney high or low, not sure about offense): Uconn , SF Austin, little rock, nova , msu, and Kansas.Doesn't this say that Little Rock, Wichita State, Bakersfield, SF Austin, Cincy, and UConn are all more efficient defensively than any of those three teams?
Well, according to Synergy, we're in the Top 10 for each only among low seeds. At .962 we're nowhere near the top of the Offensive List.Yes. Only 6 teams land in Synergy's top ten efficiency rankings for both offense and defense: Uconn , SF Austin, little rock, nova , msu, and Kansas.
You'd hope they'd find a way to norm for level of competition.@tzznandrew yep ha just had a brain fart and edited that. Cincy and uconn may have their defensive numbers inflated facing some of the dredges of the AAC, but I doubt by that much.
I much happier to see them in the second round IF we make it there than the likes of Michigan St., UNC, Kentucky, Oregon, Virginia, St. Joes, etc.....
^^^ ...
-------------------------------------
There have been 31 tournaments since the expansion of the NCAAs to 64 teams. In those 31 tournaments, there have been 248 8 or 9 seeds, and 124 matchups between the 1 seed and the 8/9. The 8/9 seed is 17/124 in that matchup: a 13.7% winning percentage. The teams that do win, only win an average of 1.17 games beyond the upset.
Further, of those scant 17 wins, only 5/17 wins have come from the 9 seed, and only 2 of those 5 have won another game beyond that.
That said, in 2 of the last 3 NCAAs, a Final Four participant has come out of that spot.
Beat Colorado, and maybe we can be the odds. But the odds say we're doomed.