Anyone here watching Bama and Clemson tonight? | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Anyone here watching Bama and Clemson tonight?

tzznandrew said:
And it was without their starting QB.

Again, I find the whole "the little guys can't win" argument silly. Of course they can if given a chance. Would they? Not often. Clemson was the best team this year and would have likely won with an 8-team tournament.

But you'd lose all the griping and it would feel more fair if college football did what literally every other team sport does.
Expand ...

And LSU played without half of their defensive starters....

And, no...you would not stop "all the griping"....it would then just move to the ones now left out. Fresno State would this year be whining that they won 11 games and Michigan only 10, etc.

As far as what other sports do? There is no national sport quite like football...requiring such a multitude of players, and as physical.

Saying all that, I wouldn't mind an eight team playoff featuring the eight best teams in the country..(On merit...no AQ).
 
Last edited:
And no...little guys can't win if they only had a chance (a convenient fiction)....the last 50 years of NCAA BB tournaments tell us that...Only if they are a team that now plays in a P5 or the Big East, or UConn have they won.

All of those "little guys" just provide interesting color but do not win a national championship...and that is in a sport that having only a couple of great players on a team can make you very competitive.
 
Anyway...back to the game...

I don't think that I can remember a true freshman quarterback and a true freshman WR combo with the skill and impact of Clemson's Lawrence and Ross.

But...even with those two playing pass and catch...it was the future NFL'rs on the Tiger defense that won the game.
 
billybud said:
Well...I don't think that it would be fair for a team to play the 88th ranked SOS, and beat that weak schedule, play for it, if they are only one game ahead of a team that only lost one game but played a schedule 50 ranks tougher (Ohio State and Oklahoma) .
UCF did play a three loss SEC team in the bowl...it was entertaining.
Expand ...

Yeah so if my favorite college team (UConn) can’t make the playoffs regardless of how the season plays out why am I wasting time watching college football?
 
UofCT2009 said:
Yeah so if my favorite college team (UConn) can’t make the playoffs regardless of how the season plays out why am I wasting time watching college football?
Expand ...
Lol, UConn is the worst team in the country. Just quit watching the sport.
 
dannyHAM said:
Scariest part is that he has 2 more years left...
Expand ...

Careful now. I have watched Lawrence a couple of times this season and he is a terrific passer and a pretty good runner. He is as good a QB as anyone I've seen this season in college ball. However, that does not automatically translate to him getting better and better each year. Athletically and QB wise he may already be as good as he is gonna get. These things don't necessarily follow a steady upward progression.
 
.-.
billybud said:
And no...little guys can't win if they only had a chance (a convenient fiction)....the last 50 years of NCAA BB tournaments tell us that...Only if they are a team that now plays in a P5 or the Big East, or UConn have they won.

All of those "little guys" just provide interesting color but do not win a national championship...and that is in a sport that having only a couple of great players on a team can make you very competitive.
Expand ...

UNLV ring a bell?
 
Robertelamin said:
UNLV ring a bell?
Expand ...

Oh yes...UNLV the only exception in 50 years...As I noted earlier.

Tark had a great team in a different era 30 years ago ....but still once in 50 years.
 
Last edited:
UofCT2009 said:
Yeah so if my favorite college team (UConn) can’t make the playoffs regardless of how the season plays out why am I wasting time watching college football?
Expand ...

You enjoy the season like the 11 win Utah State fans, the 11 win Army fans, the 11 win Cincy fans...
 
.-.
Robertelamin said:
Oh yes...so you’re wrong. There have also been 3 mid majors in the championship game just this decade.
Expand ...


Nope....not one met the criteria that I posted of not being the current member of a P5, the Big East, or UConn...

Who you calling mid major? Surely not the Big East in basketball?

LOL...and I had excepted UNLV a page back as the only exception to that...in the last 50 years...
 
billybud said:
You enjoy the season like the 11 win Utah State fans, the 11 win Army fans, the 11 win Cincy fans...
Expand ...
billybud said:
You enjoy the season like the 11 win Utah State fans, the 11 win Army fans, the 11 win Cincy fans...
Expand ...

Of course but it’s stil unfair that majority of teams can’t make the playoff. I think an 8-team playoff will solve that.
 
billybud said:
And LSU played without half of their defensive starters....

And, no...you would not stop "all the griping"....it would then just move to the ones now left out. Fresno State would this year be whining that they won 11 games and Michigan only 10, etc.

As far as what other sports do? There is no national sport quite like football...requiring such a multitude of players, and as physical.

Saying all that, I wouldn't mind an eight team playoff featuring the eight best teams in the country..(On merit...no AQ).
Expand ...
Presumptuous of you to assume what I would do. I don't care about Fresno; Michigan was clearly a better team.

But a system that shuts out over half college football from actually competing for a title is one that is flawed, boring, and not worth my time. An undefeated team should get a real shot at a title. The end.

An 8 team playoff: P5 champions, best G5, 2 wild cards, would be infinitely more interesting.
 
How about an 8 team playoff with just the "8 best in the country"...?

Regardless of conference.
 
"Presumptuous of you to assume what I would do. I don't care about Fresno; Michigan was clearly a better team."

Exactly...

Fresno won 11 against a weak schedule (#78)...and yet you are presumptuous enough to assume that UCF, who also won 11 games, with not as tough a schedule as Fresno, deserves to play.

I don't care about UCF the way you don't care about Fresno.

You have to beat a top 30 team...
 
billybud said:
"Presumptuous of you to assume what I would do. I don't care about Fresno; Michigan was clearly a better team."

Exactly...

Fresno won 11 against a weak schedule (#78)...and yet you are presumptuous enough to assume that UCF, who also won 11 games, with not as tough a schedule as Fresno, deserves to play.

I don't care about UCF the way you don't care about Fresno.

You have to beat a top 30 team...
Expand ...
I think thats fair, assuming a top 30 team is willing to play the likes of UCF. Instead of Samford and Northern Illinois, FSU should have to play UCF and USF. Let the best team win. You know, instead of padding your wins in order to be bowl eligible.
 
.-.
billybud said:
Nope....not one met the criteria that I posted of not being the current member of a P5, the Big East, or UConn...

Who you calling mid major? Surely not the Big East in basketball?

LOL...and I had excepted UNLV a page back as the only exception to that...in the last 50 years...
Expand ...
Yea, except Butler wasn’t in the Big East at the time and managed to get there still. I’m sure you’ll try and stick to your point, but it’s no small difference.

Oh, and lest we forget about Gonzaga.
 
Mano said:
Yea, except Butler wasn’t in the Big East at the time and managed to get there still. I’m sure you’ll try and stick to your point, but it’s no small difference.

Oh, and lest we forget about Gonzaga.
Expand ...

And Memphis in 08
 
djct1999 said:
I think thats fair, assuming a top 30 team is willing to play the likes of UCF. Instead of Samford and Northern Illinois, FSU should have to play UCF and USF. Let the best team win. You know, instead of padding your wins in order to be bowl eligible.
Expand ...

Oh...Florida just offered to play UCF on a 2 for 1....UCF said "no".

The schools are 112 miles apart...great for fans.

And I have no sympathy for UCF's refusal....after all, FSU when making their break...played at Ohio State (2X), Michigan (2X), Michigan State (2X), LSU (5X), Nebraska (2X)...no returns.
 
Lowest ratings for a CFP
billybud said:
How about an 8 team playoff with just the "8 best in the country"...?

Regardless of conference.
Expand ...
Because that's not how literally any other American sport does things. Conference, division, etc. always plays a role. What you're doing keeps college football different, when what I'm suggesting makes it more like everyone else.

The "8 best in the country" is subjective. I'm willing to go with some subjectivity. See: March Madness. But taking some of that out so that there is a clear definable goal to the playoffs and a chance for the title would be best.

In college basketball, Samford knows it's probably not going to win the title. But if they win their conference tournament, they have a shot.

UCF can go undefeated for two straight years and not sniff the playoffs. Talk about schedules all you want, but it's not like they have control of their conference, which drags it down, nor entire control of their OOC.
 
I hate throwing merit out the door in a small format (like 8 team playoff).

In basketball, you can have AQ's and the best teams will still play,
 
.-.
UCF has been doing what Bill Snyder was famous for...playing a weak schedule puposefully and ending up higher in the rankings.
 
"The venerable K-State coach has built the Wildcat program into national relevance over three decades, and part of his plan has been weak non-conference schedules."

Snyder has been adamant over the years that an easy non-conference schedule with all home games is best for K-State, in terms of developing players and the athletic budget.

*On the other hand, you could possibly make the argument that there was some boldness in his decision to essentially pioneer the highly effective strategy of devising a weaker than weak nonconference schedule. He took the important, easy wins and ignored all the criticism from fans and media.".
 
Mano said:
Interestingly I can’t find record of that anywhere...
Expand ...

I believe that was the second time cal made the final four for the first time...
 
Mano said:
Yea, except Butler wasn’t in the Big East at the time and managed to get there still. I’m sure you’ll try and stick to your point, but it’s no small difference.

Oh, and lest we forget about Gonzaga.
Expand ...

Gonzaga won a NC?

Butler?

Get outa here !
 
The premise is that...except for UNLV 30 years ago, no team that is not currently either a P5, Big East, or UConn...has won a basketball national championship in 50 years.

Sure...some had wins and advanced....but the "little guys" do not win the championships.
 
billybud said:
The premise is that...except for UNLV 30 years ago, no team that is not currently either a P5, Big East, or UConn...has won a basketball national championship in 50 years.

Sure...some had wins and advanced....but the "little guys" do not win the championships.
Expand ...
This is silly, you can say that about the little guy in football but it's totally different in basketball.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,346
Messages
4,566,175
Members
10,468
Latest member
ADD3LA


Top Bottom