- Joined
- Nov 6, 2012
- Messages
- 3,417
- Reaction Score
- 9,306
Can't believe the Terps lost at home. Looking past Washington maybe?
Washington has about 3 other players who dress and can play.Well, at least now he'll have about 5 days to coach up one or more of the reserves in case they have to take the court.
If Washington could beat Maryland at College Park with 5-1/2 players, they've got at least a respectable chance with 5-1/4 at Lexington.
imagine that - the 5th best team from the "vastly overrated" & "weak" PAC 12 just decisively took down the anointed "5th-best team" in wbb - on their home court. I guess that's why they play the games.![]()
Washington has about 3 other players who dress and can play.
The toughest bracket is always UConn's, at least for everyone elseSince I'm interested in such things, going into today Sagarin/Massey ratings for the top 4 seeds in Lexington:
Notre Dame - 3/2
Maryland - 4/5
Kentucky - 10/13
Stanford - 7/11
Suggests Maryland is the best 2-seed. Kentucky is a properly seeded 3 and Stanford is underseeded as a 4. And Kentucky is at home. To me, Lexington is by far the toughest bracket.
Why was Maryland ranked #5 ? a moral victory over UConn ? a pathetic schedule that gave them a good record ? A 3-3 record vs top 25 teams ? last years team ?
There was nothing they did this year to warrant a #2 seed
If Kentucky beats Washington I think they will give Notre Dame all they want in Lexington. Truth be known, I'd love for the Gamecocks to be able to beat the Mildcats for a 4th time this season. They are the team and head coach I most dislike in WBB. Come to mention it, I don't like them in MBB, either.
PAC 12's doing well in the WNIT, too.
RPI took a huge hit this season when UConn was rated as the #3 team in the nation, but the PAC 12 is certainly justifying its rating as the number one conference. The SEC also has four teams; I believe they were rated #2, but I could be mistaken. If so, RPI has made a strong comeback.
Can't believe the Terps lost at home. Looking past Washington maybe?
Brenda has regress as a coach. I thought she was brilliant two years ago when she beat #1 Tennessee and Louisville on their home court. Last year she swept the Big 10 regular season and tournament and made the final 4. This season you could see the signs they could be beaten. During their OOC schedule and the UConn game they were very, very good. Then when the Big 10 season started for some reason she leaned very heavily on her seniors, juniors and Kristen Confroy who is a good outside shooter and rebounder for her size. But at the same time she pretty much ignore her 4 talented and athletic players who made great contributions during the OOC schedule but rarely got of the bench during the Big 10 tournament and NCAA tournament. Brenda showed an extreme lack of imagination in her coaching this season and even though the team won 31 games this season, that was the most disappointing 31 win season in college basketball history.
When you have a Ferrari with 5 speeds, it seems like a waste when you only use 3 speeds and never use the 4th or 5th gear. This is what I summarize Maryland's season in 2015-16. So much potential wasted.
I find this post extremely ironic, because Maryland was pretty much the only 2-seed that no one was questioning before the tournament.
With Maryland in the Big1G now and Maryland/ND not playing each other (like last year), I only saw the Terps a few times this year. So I've got a (very) few observations and questions:
- The Terps lose Moseley, Pfiman and Howard but return Walker-Kimbrough, Jones and Confroy. I'd say possible addition by subtraction, but you're bring in seven (7!) frosh. Yes, it's the number #1 rated team, but where do you think Brenda goes with these ingredients? (See similar scenario for Baylor, Ohio State and, to a lesser degree, North Carolina, who are bringing in 5).
- I had forgetten that there was also a massive turnover in assistant coaches. Do you think that could've had an effect? Brenda not only coaching the players, but the coaches, too? Maybe they'll hit their groove in terms of expectations next year?
Will be interested in your insights...
Come on, seriously give some credit: "Their center can't jump": That non-jumping center shut down Brionna Jones and snagged EVERY rebound in the deciding stretch of the game. She beasted you the way Jones beasted UCONN and there were plenty of UNCONN fans giving Jones credit.As far as the game last night, Brenda gets a F in two categories, game plan and proper use of personnel. As stated many times, Washington only uses 6 players. They only have two guards basically. Their center can't jump and they have to have her park at the foul circle because if she's inside fighting for offensive rebounds, it will be impossible for her to run down the court on defense. With a team like that you use your athletes to press them all game long, not only to tire them out and maybe get them in foul trouble, but to speed up the game and get them in a track meet. Maryland basically played the entire game in half court sets and couldn't get Brionna Jones established. As a previous poster stated their jump shots were not falling so you try to trap them, get steals and make easy baskets. No imagination at all from the coaching staff. Maybe this is due to new personnel on the coaching staff. Maybe they did well the previous two years because of (Year 1 - Thomas, Year 2 - Brown and Mincy). They had SWK and Jones (plus a really good two player bench in Moseley and Pfirman) and that should have been enough.
Before this game I had them as the 3rd best team in the country behind Notre Dame and Baylor next season. I am going to have to revise that to 6th. Behind Notre Dame, Baylor, South Carolina, UConn and Ohio State and barely ahead of Louisville and Texas. I expect the starting lineup to be Slocum, SWK, Confroy, Fraser and Jones with Kiah Gillespie being the 6th player. Brenda's use of her bench gets a D this season as talented players such as Fraser, Gillespie, Kiara Leslie (the team best defensive player and can guard 4 positions) and A'lexus Harrison barely saw the floor in Big 10 play and the post season. I wonder if she'll incorporate talented players like Blair Watson (several triple doubles this season with both assists and blocks), Kaila Charles and Jenna Staiti (51 points in a losing effort in the semi-finals of the state of Georgia post season tournament) into the rotation. Maybe because the team will have only two seniors, she'll have to.
Come on, seriously give some credit: "Their center can't jump": That non-jumping center shut down Brionna Jones and snagged EVERY rebound in the deciding stretch of the game. She beasted you the way Jones beasted UCONN and there were plenty of UNCONN fans giving Jones credit.
You should they stink in footballOr football even... It makes me physically nauseous when we lose to Kentucky in football.
Beating Kentucky in the Final Four would be LOVELY.
Brown transfered too.With Maryland in the Big1G now and Maryland/ND not playing each other (like last year), I only saw the Terps a few times this year. So I've got a (very) few observations and questions:
- The Terps lose Moseley, Pfiman and Howard but return Walker-Kimbrough, Jones and Confroy. I'd say possible addition by subtraction, but you're bring in seven (7!) frosh. Yes, it's the number #1 rated team, but where do you think Brenda goes with these ingredients? (See similar scenario for Baylor, Ohio State and, to a lesser degree, North Carolina, who are bringing in 5).
- I had forgetten that there was also a massive turnover in assistant coaches. Do you think that could've had an effect? Brenda not only coaching the players, but the coaches, too? Maybe they'll hit their groove in terms of expectations next year?
Will be interested in your insights...
You should they stink in football
Brown transfered too.