- Joined
- Dec 31, 2011
- Messages
- 322
- Reaction Score
- 968
Interesting thoughts on this thread.
I think that history tends to over-emphasize failures and successes, and I'm sure I'll get killed for this.
If Donyell, for example, had led the team to a championship in '94, then he'd be the greatest Husky ever, by most people's standards. Instead, he misses frees, and his legacy is tarnished. For want of a couple of wins, his entire career is downgraded.
On the flip side, Hamilton hits a fall away winner and is part of a NC team, and suddenly he's better than the 22/5/3 guy with less than average defense that he was his final year.
Donyell's final season was amazing. He was amazing. He was dominant, and could shoot from deep, shoot off screens, rebound, and he was, importantly, a phenomenal defender. He was the whole package. His failure to thrive in the NBA will always be a mystery to me.
But, from a college perspective, Hamilton was a great scorer and, overall, a very good college player. But he was nowhere near Donyell's level.
That's just one example - there are many more.
Great points. The flipside to that is Kemba. Kemba will always be considered an all-time great for what he did in nyc and the tourney. But in his final year, he also went through a lengthy stretch where he couldn't make a shot (pretty important esp. for a guard) and the team went on a long losing streak.