I think that's silly! Are you saying Geno was chopped liver until he got Rebecca Lobo and Kara Walters and won the National Championship in 1995? I would say that he was a great coach to take the players he had in the late 80's and make them into a highly competitive bunch, then when he recruited Kerry Bascom who was indeed outstanding, he got them to a Final Four. By the way, I'm inclined to think that Kerry Bascom was not an All-American during her UConn career. In any case he made decent players good, he made good players better and he made outstanding players great. It doesn't work for everyone but he's typically gotten players to play better than they ever thought they could, by pushing them past the limitations that they had set for themselves. When you can bring out the best in a multitude of players, then you qualify as a great coach. Duke and Tennessee and most other teams have had outstanding teams that continually underachieved. How many teams do you think UConn has had that have underachieved? I would say NADA! With conditioning, practices and mental challenges, Geno's teams are pretty much prepared for all challenges and that speaks to Geno and Chris and his staff. If you gave Geno the recruit CCSU has had over the last four years I know that he wouldn't have won the championship this year but wouldn't you be inclined to think that they would have probably been more successful. Part of UConn's success is that he finds talent and by that I'm not talking about physical abilities alone but the type person who he feels can learn and evolve and is willing to do the work necessary to make her and HER TEAMMATES more successful. Some people recruit solely on how many points, how many rebounds, how many steals and though they are important, Geno looks longer and more DEEPLY to find someone who can do those things but more importantly play the type of game he wants to play. Stef didn't have the world coming after her when she was a high school senior but Geno saw things in her that a lot of other coaches overlooked and look what she's meant to this program. Amazing!
At no point am I saying or even implying that Coach Auriemma was chopped liver prior to getting the top players. But when the top players started arriving in bunches, his brilliance as a Coach became exponentially more evident. As good as UConn's 1995 team was, the difference maker was Nykesha Sales; defense, playmaking, scoring, she was the whole package and then some.
Kerry Bascom, as mentioned earlier was definitely an All American.
Coach Auriemma's best coaching performance, IMO, was in 2006. I cannot evaluate 1991 or the years prior.
Stefanie Dolson, is by far, the greatest single improvement from freshman to senior year. What's more impressive is that her trial came under fire. She did not have the time to take her time with her development. UConn needed her right away and she delivered. By the end of her freshman year, I thought she was the second best center in WCBB.
UConn is in a very good position to pick and choose the players they want for their program. However, I do not believe for one second that he passes on a
top player because of a perception of a bad fit. He will, though, pass on top players when they do not commit to UConn when offered.
Yes, Duke and Tennessee and a number of other programs have had very good players, but name a
great player with whom they have underachieved. When Tennessee had great players, they owned UConn. When Duke had better players than UConn, they were competitive. When North Carolina more talent than UConn, they owned UConn. There are not many programs about which that can be said given UConn's tremendous record. But how many times has UConn won when they were not the better team? This, however is not a good argument given the nature of basketball. Outstanding teams can have a bad day, mediocre teams can catch magic in a bottle.
Suffice it to say that Coach Auriemma is a great coach; excellent instincts, dedicated staff. Most of all, great players.