Is ASU that much of a step up?
ASU's athletic department has a budget of about $100 million per year. UConn has an annual budget of about $93 million a year.Yes
And they're still never anything more than mediocre in the two big sports.ASU's athletic department has a budget of about $100 million per year. UConn has an annual budget of about $93 million a year.
I don't know if it's fair to say that the KO situation was woefully mishandled particularly because Benedict was following the advice of outside counsel. Firing a guy who cheated, got caught, lied to the A.D., and lied to the NCAA is pretty much a given unless you're Kansas. It ended up becoming a sheetshow because Ollie's counsel decided that making it a sheetshow played to his benefit. In the end, Connecticut lost because the arbiter decided to write out the section of KO's contract that the university relied upon to fire him. I don't think that was reasonably foreseeable to outside counsel and especially not to Benedict.The KO situation was woefully mishandled, but to be fair to Benedict he was following the advice of outside counsel.
He wouldn't have cost us an extra penny if the BOT had been willing to accept reality.The positive is that he has brought in talented coaches.
The negatives:
- he cost the university an extra $3 million in the way he handled Ollie's firing.
- He screwed over a lot of long time season ticket holders by changing the season ticket model and then changing price tiers 2-3 years after implementing the new model.
I think we'll survive if he leaves as long as the new AD gets Hurley's seal of approval.
UConn would not be in the ACC in 2012 if God was our AD. BC was never going to be in favor of it, especially with DeFilippo as their AD. BC was defending their turf and there was too much bad blood as a result of BC's defection to the ACC.I truly believe if DB was our AD in 2012 we'd be in the ACC now instead of Pitt or Louisville. People on the football board seem to dislike him because we're not in a power conference for football, but I don't really know what else they expect him to do.
I think he's been good - hired Hurley, recognized the crapfest that was the AAC and brought us to the Big East.
He has been SIGNIFICANTLY better than his two previous predecessor'sI like DB as a person but do not think he has been a particularly good AD for us. Would be fine with seeing him move on to greener pastures.
That's not saying muchHe has been SIGNIFICANTLY better than his two previous predecessor's
Its certainly a low bar. Warde Manuel failed upwards to Michigan. With how successful he's been there thus far you can tell he was just biding his time until that job opened. I don't think he ever took this job as seriously as we needed at the craziest time in our AD's history.That's not saying much
and before that we had Jeff "Status Quo" HathawayIts certainly a low bar. Warde Manuel failed upwards to Michigan. With how successful he's been there thus far you can tell he was just biding his time until that job opened. I don't think he ever took this job as seriously as we needed at the craziest time in our AD's history.
Maybe, I don't really think BC has ever had that much sway. I think AD DB would have done more to really get Tobacco Road on board to convince everyone else because their opinions mean a lot more than lowly BC.UConn would not be in the ACC in 2012 if God was our AD. BC was never going to be in favor of it, especially with DeFilippo as their AD. BC was defending their turf and there was too much bad blood as a result of BC's defection to the ACC.
I wouldn't trust Hathaway with knowing how to turn a stove on and off.He has been SIGNIFICANTLY better than his two previous predecessor's
Is ASU that much of a step up?
Weather wise. Yes.
(Tempe had 30 consecutive days over 110 last year, 54 total.)
"We'll take 2 or 3 more answers on the weather question before voting."Would be fine with seeing him move on to greener pastures.
I agree. So much more goes into the argument of which is a better job. The amount of money is always seen as the only thing that matters on this board. You could be the CEO of a giant fast food Corp and make millions, but consequently contribute to the health woes of an entire continent. You could be the AD of a P5 school and never sniff a meaningful title.And they're still never anything more than mediocre in the two big sports.
I know a number of lawyers who were involved in the decision making process. There were some who thought outside counsel was leading the Athletic Dept. down the wrong road. I stand by what I said without being able to say more.I don't know if it's fair to say that the KO situation was woefully mishandled particularly because Benedict was following the advice of outside counsel. Firing a guy who cheated, got caught, lied to the A.D., and lied to the NCAA is pretty much a given unless you're Kansas. It ended up becoming a sheetshow because Ollie's counsel decided that making it a sheetshow played to his benefit. In the end, Connecticut lost because the arbiter decided to write out the section of KO's contract that the university relied upon to fire him. I don't think that was reasonably foreseeable to outside counsel and especially not to Benedict.
Benedict pulled the trigger, when he had to, and hired an excellent replacement in Dan Hurley. There's a lot of decisions that Dave has made that we could be critical of, But his handling of that situation probably isn't one of them, the unfavorable result notwithstanding.