JoePgh
Cranky pants and wise acre
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 3,756
- Reaction Score
- 22,104
I've seen a number of comments in the postgame threads about how UConn was completely unable to deal with the press defense that Creighton implemented in the final 6 minutes of the game. Some suggested that if Creighton had played that kind of defense for the whole game, they would have won easily.
I think this viewpoint is misleading, and you can see this if you look at the details of those last 6 minutes. UConn got its largest lead of the game with 5:56 left in the game when Liv made her "and 1" 3-point play (and scored her only paint points of the day). At that point, I really think UConn (on Geno's instruction) was primarily focused on milking the clock and protecting the lead, rather than scoring a lot more points. And they were fairly successful with this: the lead remained at 17 until 4:28 when it became 15. It stayed there until 3:14 when it became 13, which lasted until 2:10 when it became 11. Then at 1:41 it became 9 points, at which point Geno called a timeout. At 1:11, Aaliyah Edwards made 2 free throws to put the lead back to 11 -- UConn's only points in the last 6 minutes, and Aaliyah's only points of the second half. The lead remained at 11 until Morgan Maly's 3-point score at 0:18, far too late to make any difference.
The point of all this is that even though UConn was not scoring during these 6 minutes, Creighton (who started 17 points behind) was not closing the lead at nearly the pace which would be needed to make the game close or put the outcome in question. Part of this was effective defense, but another part of it was extending the time consumed by UConn's offensive possessions, i.e., milking the clock. You can say that Creighton's press shut down UConn's scoring, but that is only valid (at least as far as extrapolating to the entire game is concerned) if you assume that UConn was making a serious effort to score as many points as possible during that time period. It wasn't -- it was trying to use up the clock and protect the lead.
If you watch the replay of the last 6 minutes, you will see that UConn never lost possession of the ball in the backcourt as a result of Creighton's press. It did turn over the ball in the half court offense a few times, and there were a number of other close calls. It's likely that a more skilled pressing team would have gotten a few turnovers, but Creighton didn't. So I disagree with those who say that UConn wasn't able to handle Creighton's press.
I do agree with another frequent comment in the postgame threads -- that UConn inexplicably went away from its inside game in the second half. It is a mystery why that happened. Dorka had 0 points in the second half, and Aaliyah had only those two late free throws in the entire half, after both were effective in the first half. Liv made the 3-point play at the 6-minute mark of the 4th quarter, but did nothing else in the paint for the entire game. Did any of you sharp-eyed observers notice a defensive adjustment by Creighton in the second half to shut down UConn's inside game? I didn't, but maybe I need to watch the second half again.
I think this viewpoint is misleading, and you can see this if you look at the details of those last 6 minutes. UConn got its largest lead of the game with 5:56 left in the game when Liv made her "and 1" 3-point play (and scored her only paint points of the day). At that point, I really think UConn (on Geno's instruction) was primarily focused on milking the clock and protecting the lead, rather than scoring a lot more points. And they were fairly successful with this: the lead remained at 17 until 4:28 when it became 15. It stayed there until 3:14 when it became 13, which lasted until 2:10 when it became 11. Then at 1:41 it became 9 points, at which point Geno called a timeout. At 1:11, Aaliyah Edwards made 2 free throws to put the lead back to 11 -- UConn's only points in the last 6 minutes, and Aaliyah's only points of the second half. The lead remained at 11 until Morgan Maly's 3-point score at 0:18, far too late to make any difference.
The point of all this is that even though UConn was not scoring during these 6 minutes, Creighton (who started 17 points behind) was not closing the lead at nearly the pace which would be needed to make the game close or put the outcome in question. Part of this was effective defense, but another part of it was extending the time consumed by UConn's offensive possessions, i.e., milking the clock. You can say that Creighton's press shut down UConn's scoring, but that is only valid (at least as far as extrapolating to the entire game is concerned) if you assume that UConn was making a serious effort to score as many points as possible during that time period. It wasn't -- it was trying to use up the clock and protect the lead.
If you watch the replay of the last 6 minutes, you will see that UConn never lost possession of the ball in the backcourt as a result of Creighton's press. It did turn over the ball in the half court offense a few times, and there were a number of other close calls. It's likely that a more skilled pressing team would have gotten a few turnovers, but Creighton didn't. So I disagree with those who say that UConn wasn't able to handle Creighton's press.
I do agree with another frequent comment in the postgame threads -- that UConn inexplicably went away from its inside game in the second half. It is a mystery why that happened. Dorka had 0 points in the second half, and Aaliyah had only those two late free throws in the entire half, after both were effective in the first half. Liv made the 3-point play at the 6-minute mark of the 4th quarter, but did nothing else in the paint for the entire game. Did any of you sharp-eyed observers notice a defensive adjustment by Creighton in the second half to shut down UConn's inside game? I didn't, but maybe I need to watch the second half again.