- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
- Messages
- 810
- Reaction Score
- 2,967
This is actually pretty darn good, if you ask me. To predict 97% of the at-large field correctly and to get 88% of the field within one seed line is quite good. Let's recall that the committee can move teams up or down a seed line in order to achieve a "better" bracket (in its estimation). Regional placement is inherently unpredictable because it can be impacted in a domino effect by widely varying permutations of decisions.
Well after completing the 2017 data I might have to agree with you.
Here are the results from 2016-17 season.
- He only missed 2 teams. (Michigan and Virginia instead of UNI and California selected).
- He got 47% team's seed correct and 80% within 1 seed. So only 13 teams missed by >1 seed.
- 8 of 64 perfect (13%) i.e. Seed + Regional.
If anyone knows a source I can get final Bracketology from prior season I can post those.

