AAC to ESPN+? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

AAC to ESPN+?

Joined
Nov 1, 2014
Messages
4,455
Reaction Score
31,757
And this doesn't sound good!_:eek:_:mad:

1553706907132.png
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
2,035
Reaction Score
9,113
Perhaps now I'll watch the games the day after on that Husky Games website. Then I won't need cable.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2014
Messages
4,455
Reaction Score
31,757
Unless SNY ponies up and continues to buy UConn games. —from ESPN -- which is a good possibility —because that revenue stream would be 1. Guaranteed and 2. Probably worth more than aggregate subscriptions
Sure hope you're on target. However, the Wilpons don't pony up very often. :(

Maybe we need an SCT to take over for SNY. Any interested investors?
.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2014
Messages
9,874
Reaction Score
29,425
Imagine most of you would think it would be going too far to just boycott the whole espn family until they conduct themselves in a more fan friendly manner?
No more required streaming, no more "whip around" etc
Without ESPN there would be little or no coverage of WBB. I don't blame them. As part of their new deal with the AAC, UConn's conference take increases by $5 million. UConn is getting a raise and somebody has to pay for it - you.
 

Carnac

That venerable sage from the west
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
15,932
Reaction Score
78,988
$4.99/month for 4-5 months

That $4.99/month for 5 months is relative. Everyone here is not in the same boat. I've been paying $13.99/month during the wcbb season to add the "sports pack" to my channel lineup on DirecTV the last 5-6 years, so that I could access SNY.

I cancel it right after the last game of the regular season that is carried by SNY. To me, $4.99/month to continue to view UConn games live is a bargain. I'll gladly pay it. :)
 

zls44

Your #icebus Tour Director
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
9,059
Reaction Score
24,351
The deal doesn't go into effect until the 2020-21 season- it isn't worth panicking about SNY. They've said they're open to dealing with SNY, so let's see what happens.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
2,656
Reaction Score
4,696
Without ESPN there would be little or no coverage of WBB. I don't blame them. As part of their new deal with the AAC, UConn's conference take increases by $5 million. UConn is getting a raise and somebody has to pay for it - you.

j66: strong points as is usually the case with you. Appreciate those thoughts.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
2,656
Reaction Score
4,696
The deal doesn't go into effect until the 2020-21 season- it isn't worth panicking about SNY. They've said they're open to dealing with SNY, so let's see what happens.

zls: also good clear points. And reassuring for now. Thanks. (I still don't like ESPN though) ( :
 

RockyMTblue2

Don't Look Up!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
21,983
Reaction Score
96,687

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,974
Reaction Score
208,828
ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU and ABC Women’s Basketball:
  • At least 13 regular season games per season, with a minimum of five on ESPN and ESPN2.
  • Conference Tournament Semifinals on ESPN, ESPN2 or ESPNU and the Conference Final on ESPN or ESPN2.
ESPN+ Women’s Basketball:
  • Approximately 160 conference-controlled games per year in addition to those on ESPN’s linear networks, plus the first round and quarterfinals of the conference tournament.
ESPN PRESS RELEASE

Hmm, if the + games are "conference controlled", can we get them to choose other schools and send our remaining games to SNY?
 

JoePgh

Cranky pants and wise acre
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
3,646
Reaction Score
21,216
I also read that ESPN will NOT, under this agreement, cover the production costs of the telecasts unless the game is on one of their broadcast channels (as has been the case in the past). So for the UConn WCBB games even to get on ESPN+, someone other than ESPN would have to hire announcers and camera folks to produce the broadcasts which ESPN+ would carry. It seems like that could only be SNY or UConn itself. I would think all three parties would have an interest in someone doing this, and SNY would seem like the logical choice for producing game broadcasts.

So I would envision a deal whereby SNY undertakes to produce the games, and would pay ESPN for the rights to the content. ESPN has an interest in maximizing the online audience for the games, and in fact would have no way even to offer them unless someone like SNY produces the broadcasts. So I'm sure they would be interested in a deal whereby they offer SNY broadcast rights in exchange for their content rights and some cash. That means SNY would pay ESPN rather than UConn for the broadcast rights, but might not pay any more than they are paying UConn now. UConn is being paid through the AAC deal, and might not get any other dollars out of the arrangement.

For us consumers, the end result would be pretty much the status quo, or so I would think.
 
Joined
Jan 30, 2017
Messages
3,041
Reaction Score
14,436
A good opportunity now to jump to the Big East in basketball...let football fend for themselves.
 

UConnCat

Wise Woman
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
13,826
Reaction Score
85,991
Maybe the State of Connecticut can just once remind ESPN where it’s headquarters reside.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
345
Reaction Score
748
Maybe the State of Connecticut can just once remind ESPN where it’s headquarters reside.
If we had any politicians in this state worth their salt ESPN wouldn't get away with this sheat. ESPN is squeezing us. It should be the other way around.
 

Online statistics

Members online
643
Guests online
5,174
Total visitors
5,817

Forum statistics

Threads
157,034
Messages
4,077,999
Members
9,973
Latest member
WillngtnOak


Top Bottom