UConnSportsGuy
Addicted to all things UCONN!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,087
- Reaction Score
- 6,173
Hope it isn't true, but hearing that the Attorney General and the lawyers are investigating the possibility of suing the AAC to get out of the exit fee and waiting period entirely.
Supposedly they are looking in to arguing that the AAC leadership ignored their fiduciary responsibilities in the new media rights contract. UConn agreed to the AAC exit terms and by-laws under the previous media contract. But the new contract actually reduces UConn's revenue, reduces media reach/exposure, and increases expenses (having to pay for their own production costs).
That is why UConn is acting now and not waiting a couple of years to hope for a P5 invite. By doing this now before the new contract begins, they can argue that they should not be held to the conference exit terms as the new contract violates their rights and they want to exit the conference agreement immediately without penalty. If they waited a couple of years to see how things shake out, then they would not be able to make that claim.
I hope this isn't true. Between the Blumenthal lawsuit during the original conference realignment and the Ollie lawsuit, this would be the last thing we would need. Talk about burning bridges and creating enemies and bad reputation for any future conference agreements.
I didn't hear this from an "insider", just some random person. But given the State and University's history, it doesn't seem unrealistic. Hope it is just a false rumor!
Supposedly they are looking in to arguing that the AAC leadership ignored their fiduciary responsibilities in the new media rights contract. UConn agreed to the AAC exit terms and by-laws under the previous media contract. But the new contract actually reduces UConn's revenue, reduces media reach/exposure, and increases expenses (having to pay for their own production costs).
That is why UConn is acting now and not waiting a couple of years to hope for a P5 invite. By doing this now before the new contract begins, they can argue that they should not be held to the conference exit terms as the new contract violates their rights and they want to exit the conference agreement immediately without penalty. If they waited a couple of years to see how things shake out, then they would not be able to make that claim.
I hope this isn't true. Between the Blumenthal lawsuit during the original conference realignment and the Ollie lawsuit, this would be the last thing we would need. Talk about burning bridges and creating enemies and bad reputation for any future conference agreements.
I didn't hear this from an "insider", just some random person. But given the State and University's history, it doesn't seem unrealistic. Hope it is just a false rumor!