- Joined
- Feb 18, 2017
- Messages
- 701
- Reaction Score
- 1,836
All these new staffs in the AAC (Dawkins, Janks, Dunleavy, Tubby, etc) are doin work... and they aren't even close to being at full strength.
For what profits a team if it gains a competitive league but loses its own ability to win in it.
Of course this would be the year the selection committee de-emphasizes the RPI.
For what profits a team if it gains a competitive league but loses its own ability to win in it.
Recruit: "Man, Big 12, Big East, B1G. I could play against some of the best teams in the country. Villanova, Xavier, Michigan St., Kansas, West Virginia, Purdue. This is a really difficult decision."
UConn: "Listen here son, let me talk to you for a second about the AAC's RPI..."
A vintage UConn team should rip through this league with no more than 4 losses.
Plus, the AAC has more teams than the BE and Big 12 so it's a little something called proportions.UConn being in this top 100... might show just how worthless a metric it is?
No. The AAC is a way station. I really need to hang on to that though the existing P5 contracts.Have to give credit to the AAC. They really are upping the standards of the league. It is conceivable that UConn could end up being OK stuck in this league...eventually....with a new coach.
All these new staffs in the AAC (Dawkins, Janks, Dunleavy, Tubby, etc) are doin work... and they aren't even close to being at full strength.