F should be a GUmmm what? #232 Noah Fernedes, Wichita State (5'11 PF from Mattapoisset, MA)
I'm guessing that 5 is a 6.
ESPN has already used Major 7 and included the AAC as a major league in all their online content (and mostly on TV too). It’s mostly the other outlets that haven’t been doing that (notably CBS on Selection Sunday)Wonder if ESPN will start to include AAC in their "power 6" and expand to 7 next year? Considering AAC home is ESPN & BE is Fox maybe they'll wake-up and embrace the new landscape
Is MacDuffie back for Wichita or is he a senior?Wichita St. could potentially be very good next season.
Also Houston very well could be bringing back Armani Brooks, Gresham, Chris Harris, Hinton, Jarreau and adding in another good few recruits. Memphis will be drawing much national attention. We will be improved, or atleast bringing in more talent. Exciting times for the AAC, believe it or not. Unfortunately, UCF and Cinci will probably take a step back.
Senior. So is Haynes-Jones, the guy who beat us at the buzzer.Is MacDuffie back for Wichita or is he a senior?
they were supposed to be bad this year.Cincinnati is going to be so bad next year. They lose Broome, Jenifer, and most likely Cumberland who will go to the draft. Then they don't get any good recruits going into next year, both outside the top 200. Sure they don't get lots of high profile recruits regardless but this is head turning.
Just because they weren't in the preseason top 25 doesn't mean that they were supposed to be bad.they were supposed to be bad this year.
Didn’t know where else to put this but Tulsa just landed a 4* transfer from Arkansas:
lmao people on the uc board seem to think this will be a protected seed level team if cumberland (and micky) come back. i dont get that. we're gonna be about as good next year as we were this season and with some worse luck in close games something like 23-8 seems about right.Cincinnati is going to be so bad next year. They lose Broome, Jenifer, and most likely Cumberland who will go to the draft. Then they don't get any good recruits going into next year, both outside the top 200. Sure they don't get lots of high profile recruits regardless but this is head turning.
lmao people on the uc board seem to think this will be a protected seed level team if cumberland (and micky) come back. i dont get that. we're gonna be about as good next year as we were this season and with some worse luck in close games something like 23-8 seems about right.
? What is the point you are trying to make? This year they lost players that accounted for way more scoring, playing time, etc. than they will next year. They were not picked to do well in the conference and yet they did. You say next year they will suck because of what they lose. They said the exact same thing at the beginning of this year yet they did ok.Just because they weren't in the preseason top 25 doesn't mean that they were supposed to be bad.