DobbsRover2
Slap me 10
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 4,329
- Reaction Score
- 6,720
Small conferences don't usually have unbalanced schedules. True, sometimes a 6-12 conference record team really is suddenly the best team in the conference for some reason, but more often they just got fired up and got the good bounces for a weekend. Was a 15-18 St. Francis that lost to 7-22 Wagner in February really the best team to send to the NCAAT for the Northeast conference instead of 22-9 Bryant? I hope not, but who knows. Again, blow outs aren't the worstI think conferences feel that their best team is their best tournament team, which is the team that wins the conference tournament. Whatever team wins the conference tournament is a proven winner in tournament settings, and arguably has the best chance in the NCAAT. And with unbalanced conference schedules and the ups and downs teams experience during a season a simple comparison of conference records is not a good measure of which team is the best. I also don't see how switching who get the automatic bid does anything about reducing blowouts in the early rounds. The parity problem needs to be solved by bad teams getting better, which will improve the overall women's game.