A state Superior Court judge has ruled that the hiring of Corey Edsall was not a violation and he can keep his job. | The Boneyard
.-.

A state Superior Court judge has ruled that the hiring of Corey Edsall was not a violation and he can keep his job.

Here's the money paragraph:

1541108266803.png


The only ones who didn't see that coming was the ethics board.
 
.-.
Mike Anthony: Judge ruling shows ethics challenge in UConn football coaching case was a waste of time

>>The introduction of common sense to Randy Edsall’s legal battle with the Citizen’s Ethics Advisory Board came Thursday via two succinct declarations by Superior Court Judge Joseph Shortall that amounted to a pound-your-chest UConn victory and an embarrassing defeat for the Citizen’s Ethics Advisory Board.

The board, Shortall wrote in a ruling, was "clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record” and exhibited "clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion" in claims that Edsall’s son, UConn assistant coach Corey Edsall, should not be able to keep his job.<<
 
Screen Shot 2018-11-02 at 11.25.38 AM.png



Translation -- the legislature a statute with a big, gaping hole in it. That the University exploited it is not their fault, and there is not a damn thing the ethics committee can do about it. This was always the case.
 
.-.
View attachment 35877


Translation -- the legislature a statute with a big, gaping hole in it. That the University exploited it is not their fault, and there is not a damn thing the ethics committee can do about it. This was always the case.

...the legal equivalent of "RTFM," no?
 
Well, that's a relief. I was worried about the impact to our recruiting.


I don't care about the immediate case -- I care about the precedent it would have set.
 
View attachment 35877


Translation -- the legislature a statute with a big, gaping hole in it. That the University exploited it is not their fault, and there is not a damn thing the ethics committee can do about it. This was always the case.
Could not disagree with this take more. Did you read the whole decision? The courts calls out the Ethics board for fabricating its positions. Those who are calling a body slam are spot on.
 
Could not disagree with this take more. Did you read the whole decision? The courts calls out the Ethics board for fabricating its positions. Those who are calling a body slam are spot on.

I read the entire decision, and I do love some of the slapping around that the court does. But the case hinged on whether he was an employee. He wasn't, and there is only a potential violation under the statute if he was. The entire case was about that issue, and that issue only.
 
.-.
I read the entire decision, and I do love some of the slapping around that the court does. But the case hinged on whether he was an employee. He wasn't, and there is only a potential violation under the statute if he was. The entire case was about that issue, and that issue only.
Nope. It was also about whether the supervision of Corey plan put in place was a sham as asserted by the Ethics Board. The court clearly and unequivocally said that the Ethics Board was wrong on both counts.
 
Everyone with a brain in his/her heads knew this was a colossal waste of time...except for the dopes in CT's Ethics Board. Thanks for wasting more taxpayer money, Ethics Board. The land of steady and stupid habits.
 

Online statistics

Members online
330
Guests online
4,951
Total visitors
5,281

Forum statistics

Threads
165,266
Messages
4,428,885
Members
10,270
Latest member
jess3039


p
p
Top Bottom