- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 91,824
- Reaction Score
- 351,449
body slam.Here's the money paragraph:
View attachment 35852
The only ones who didn't see that coming was the ethics board.
Here's the money paragraph:
View attachment 35852
The only ones who didn't see that coming was the ethics board.
View attachment 35877
Translation -- the legislature a statute with a big, gaping hole in it. That the University exploited it is not their fault, and there is not a damn thing the ethics committee can do about it. This was always the case.
Well, that's a relief. I was worried about the impact to our recruiting.
Could not disagree with this take more. Did you read the whole decision? The courts calls out the Ethics board for fabricating its positions. Those who are calling a body slam are spot on.View attachment 35877
Translation -- the legislature a statute with a big, gaping hole in it. That the University exploited it is not their fault, and there is not a damn thing the ethics committee can do about it. This was always the case.
Could not disagree with this take more. Did you read the whole decision? The courts calls out the Ethics board for fabricating its positions. Those who are calling a body slam are spot on.
Nope. It was also about whether the supervision of Corey plan put in place was a sham as asserted by the Ethics Board. The court clearly and unequivocally said that the Ethics Board was wrong on both counts.I read the entire decision, and I do love some of the slapping around that the court does. But the case hinged on whether he was an employee. He wasn't, and there is only a potential violation under the statute if he was. The entire case was about that issue, and that issue only.