- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 3,646
- Reaction Score
- 12,024
That might be true for a "pretty good" European player like Anna Makurat or perhaps Dorka, but a player with potentially world-class talent is probably better off establishing her bona fides in the WNBA. From a competitive standpoint, it is still (and by far) the best women's basketball league in the world, so if you are from Europe or Asia and you can make it there, you can make it anywhere. I have read that players (whether American or foreign-born) can negotiate better pay in Europe or Asia if their WNBA credentials are top-notch.
"Pretty good" American players like KLS or Tiffany Hayes are not going to make huge salaries overseas, but they will earn some significant income. Unlike Stewie or Diana, "pretty good" players will find that both the WNBA and foreign salaries are a significant part of their income, and it would hurt financially to part with either source of compensation.
And for American players, NIL and other commercial opportunities require them to keep themselves and their basketball talents in the spotlight on this side of the Atlantic. That may be the biggest reason why they will need to continue playing in the WNBA.
Do we have any idea, even a rough one, about how much KLS or Hayes is making in Europe? I'm guessing that they not only make more than they did in the W, but they are likely to remain employed longer in Europe than the highly limited, player numbers speaking, WNBA.
The press are reporting that Griner makes a million a year in Russia, compared with $220k in the W.