A Different Take on the Portal | Page 2 | The Boneyard

A Different Take on the Portal

Joined
Feb 17, 2022
Messages
185
Reaction Score
383
The one word I have for the Transfer Portal, is "sad." In the past, if a player had any issue, by knowing they would be in place for several years, they were motivated to solve it. Now many just transfer. Solving problems is a life skill that can't be overrated.
Without knowing the reason for the transfer which the public seldom does, it's a broad generalization to equate that one decision with the inability to problem solve.
 

Bald Husky

four score
Joined
Jan 17, 2021
Messages
2,380
Reaction Score
13,997
Oh my, Tennessee's only recruit for 22 and 23, Justine Pissot, is in the portal. They can't sign anyone, and now they can't keep the only one they did get. Their recruiting is horrible, so the free agency portal is their only option again.
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2022
Messages
403
Reaction Score
1,316
Are 17, 18, and 19 year olds (and perhaps a few years older) considered grown women?
 
Joined
May 1, 2020
Messages
6,628
Reaction Score
19,620
Are 17, 18, and 19 year olds (and perhaps a few years older) considered grown women?

Moreso than being considered toddlers in need of a time out, which is the phrasing being debated. Then again, the same question could be asked about adults with the way some behave nowadays.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2015
Messages
1,421
Reaction Score
7,130
The idea that a 'sit out year' was some draconian penalty, when an athlete was being 'paid' the same 'wage' for that year, i.e. free education room and board and stipend, seems a little overstated. Comparing it to the real world employment landscape ... it is like someone quitting their job, finding a new job and being told you really don't need to do anything except practice for the first year, then we will actually put you to work, but don't worry you get full pay and full benefits during the year.
This. I truly don't see what the big deal was about sitting out a year. A player got a scholarship, practiced, took part in team activities, sat on the bench for home games and received similiar treatment to those on the team except they didn't play in actual games. The player got the year of eligibility back. I have maintained for years the NCAA took this genie out of a bottle by giving waiver after waiver. It was the coaches, not players, who pushed for the free transfer and now they have it. I don't think the game is better for it and I'd say the majority of them would agree.
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2022
Messages
403
Reaction Score
1,316
Moreso than being considered toddlers in need of a time out, which is the phrasing being debated. Then again, the same question could be asked about adults with the way some behave nowadays.
What's being debated (to some degree) can be viewed in several different ways, but I don't believe anyone is being disrespected here regardless of their opinion and/or choice of words. I have known many a young person (teenagers and a bit older) who needed a time-out (including myself from time to time). I'm 83 and Huskynan gives me one from time to time. :)
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,634
Reaction Score
88,506
This. I truly don't see what the big deal was about sitting out a year.
Sitting out a year at that point in one's life is a massive penalty, And to what end? To make the coach's life a little easier? That's not fair.
 

Online statistics

Members online
554
Guests online
2,634
Total visitors
3,188

Forum statistics

Threads
159,766
Messages
4,203,691
Members
10,075
Latest member
Imthatguy88


.
Top Bottom