A ConnCast fueled by GemParty | The Boneyard

A ConnCast fueled by GemParty

Status
Not open for further replies.

GemParty

Co~host of the Sliders & Curveballs Podcast
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,457
Reaction Score
6,971
Visit Kevin's blog and check out- Which JC era players, based on their college careers, would make the Best Olympic team? Do you agree or have your own?


Kevin Duffy - UConn Basketball - Connecticut News
blog.ctnews.com/uconnbasketball/.../duff...
 

diggerfoot

Humanity Hiker
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
1,615
Reaction Score
9,170
After listening to their picks I was looking forward to seeing some major disagreement on here, given the nature of the Boneyard. I guess I'll have to start it off with my two cents.

They established that this was to be based on college performance, not pros, though they admitted to perhaps being influenced by pros slightly. They also mentioned this was the best roster, not the ten best players. They stated some locks among the starting five (Allen, Hamilton, Okafor); I think everyone would agree with that. It's their rationales for starting point guard and back-up center that raises eyebrows. I think one of their problems is being young without much personal experience with Huskies from before the new millennium.

Their starting point guard would be Marcus Williams. I don't have a problem with the rationale for why Walker would not start -- they wanted a distributor for all the other fine talent in the starting line-up. I don't necessarily agree with that opinion, but it does at least have sound logic to it. And it's "logical" to pick out Williams as the best distributor based solely on college performance. Yet in discussing the possibilities they did not mention one guard whose success same pre-2004. No Chris Smith, no Doron Sheffer, no Khalid El-Amin. Not even mentioning the latter's name in consideration is the byproduct of a young'un.

At least they mentioned Voskuhl's name, but that made it all the more comical in their consideration for a back-up center (Thabeet was the starter, Okafor was their PF). Now, I'm not sure I would put Voskuhl in the 10-player roster, but it was funny to listen to them struggle over the need to fill the last spot in their roster with not an offensive threat, but someone who could do all the dirty work. Their pick: Drummond. That's obviously not based on their stated criteria of either college or pro performance, only potential. Once again, I'm not sure I would put Voskuhl in the top ten, but if the criteria you are searching to meet is a big guy who will best do all the dirty work and intangibles, Voskuhl should be screaming in your head -- unless you are a young'un.

My roster, which are not the ten best Calhoun players, just the best roster that could form the best performing TEAM.

El-Amin, Sheffer
Allen, Walker
Hamilton, Butler
Donyell, Robinson
Okafor, Thabeet

I expect and respect that many would differ about Sheffer. Sheffer is not one of the ten best, but I think he would make any collection of individuals function better as a team while being a complete player; Williams falls far short of that total package. For that matter, Gordon at the two and Walker at the one provides a better team roster than one with Williams. If Robinson does not count as a Calhoun player then I might be tempted to slide Okafor to the PF and include Voskuhl. Once again, Voskuhl is not one of the ten best, but he certainly made that 1999 TEAM much better from his position. I don't see any rationale where El-Amin would not be included on the roster, let alone not even mentioned for consideration. I don't see any college performance rationale where Drummond would even be mentioned.
 

GemParty

Co~host of the Sliders & Curveballs Podcast
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,457
Reaction Score
6,971
Thats a strong 10, similar to mine. I had Nadav at pf, rather than Cliff. Plus Ricky Moore over Sheffer. Yes, Doron was better overall but theres only one ball, and I love having a Lock Down defender.
 

diggerfoot

Humanity Hiker
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
1,615
Reaction Score
9,170
Thats a strong 10, similar to mine. I had Nadav at pf, rather than Cliff. Plus Ricky Moore over Sheffer. Yes, Doron was better overall but theres only one ball, and I love having a Lock Down defender.

Ironic that you should pick Moore instead of me, and you may indeed be right that having that lock down defender would be more critical for a TEAM. I say ironic because, despite my inclusion of El-Amin and exclusion of Moore, I've always thought Moore was more critical to the 99 championship run than El-Amin. At least in the NCAA tournament itself, Moore saved us from subpar performances by El-Amin in the most critical Gonzaga and Duke games. I'd still go with Sheffer though, IMO.

Now with Henefeld you may have me. I guess with him just being a Husky for one year that gets in my way, but if we are talking about people who will make the others around him into a better team, Henefeld might very well be the best who wasn't a guard. There are many "right" answers, which is why I thought this would be an interesting thread. Though not to even include a mention of El-Amin while including Drummond, given their criteria of college performance for a team roster, was just plain wrong and revealed their youth.
 

GemParty

Co~host of the Sliders & Curveballs Podcast
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,457
Reaction Score
6,971
The one honorable mention worth adding is Shad. Even if he just entertains the team or scares opponents with a scream mask & rubber dagger. Onions Anderson- one of my Favorites!

Tell me he couldn't do what Miller did for the Heat last night? 7-8 from 3- No problem.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
164
Guests online
2,028
Total visitors
2,192

Forum statistics

Threads
160,181
Messages
4,220,289
Members
10,083
Latest member
ultimatebee


.
Top Bottom