A call/play I’d love to see moved from basketball | The Boneyard

A call/play I’d love to see moved from basketball

Dream Jobbed 2.0

“Most definitely”
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
14,848
Reaction Score
55,886
There was a lot of discussion yesterday about the illegal screen on Sid and how it’s a “point of emphasis” this year to not turn into a defender when you are performing a dribble hand off. A play that drives me crazy every time I see it is when another player, typically the inbounder, acts as a form of an escort for the man bringing the ball up. They will go up the court on the hip of the defender basically using 45 feet of moving screens to get the ball passed halfcourt. They will do it with their hands up though so you know it’s not on purpose! Rules gurus: how is this play not a moving screen? Drives me crazy.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,575
Reaction Score
95,045
I think they just consider it incidental at this point. Might be the point of emphasis next year and we can complain about it then ;)
 

Dream Jobbed 2.0

“Most definitely”
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
14,848
Reaction Score
55,886
I think they just consider it incidental at this point. Might be the point of emphasis next year and we can complain about it then ;)
But there’s no way it’s incidental. Doesn’t help my angst that I feel like we never use this technique but most over teams in America do.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
1,291
Reaction Score
2,686
There was a lot of discussion yesterday about the illegal screen on Sid and how it’s a “point of emphasis” this year to not turn into a defender when you are performing a dribble hand off. A play that drives me crazy every time I see it is when another player, typically the inbounder, acts as a form of an escort for the man bringing the ball up. They will go up the court on the hip of the defender basically using 45 feet of moving screens to get the ball passed halfcourt. They will do it with their hands up though so you know it’s not on purpose! Rules gurus: how is this play not a moving screen? Drives me crazy.
I agree 100%. Every time I see this I'm like that's a moving screen! But I've never seen it called.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,844
Reaction Score
15,384
On a similar note, the intentional foul rule was always funny. Of course they never called it when it was most obvious at the end of games. At least they ditched the name/rule.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,015
Reaction Score
82,328
There was a lot of discussion yesterday about the illegal screen on Sid and how it’s a “point of emphasis” this year to not turn into a defender when you are performing a dribble hand off. A play that drives me crazy every time I see it is when another player, typically the inbounder, acts as a form of an escort for the man bringing the ball up. They will go up the court on the hip of the defender basically using 45 feet of moving screens to get the ball passed halfcourt. They will do it with their hands up though so you know it’s not on purpose! Rules gurus: how is this play not a moving screen? Drives me crazy.

Because the guy is allowed to go down the court to get to the other end. Are you suggesting that he is required to stay under his own basket?
 

Dream Jobbed 2.0

“Most definitely”
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
14,848
Reaction Score
55,886
Because the guy is allowed to go down the court to get to the other end. Are you suggesting that he is required to stay under his own basket?
I’m suggesting he doesn’t have to continually make contact with the defense as he does it
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,015
Reaction Score
82,328
I’m suggesting he doesn’t have to continually make contact with the defense as he does it

When I see this they always go in a straight line. The ball handler may move side to side behind them and use them as a screener. If that player going up the court deviates and moves laterally into a defender, that's a moving screen and a foul.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
1,493
Reaction Score
6,755
There was a lot of discussion yesterday about the illegal screen on Sid and how it’s a “point of emphasis” this year to not turn into a defender when you are performing a dribble hand off. A play that drives me crazy every time I see it is when another player, typically the inbounder, acts as a form of an escort for the man bringing the ball up. They will go up the court on the hip of the defender basically using 45 feet of moving screens to get the ball passed halfcourt. They will do it with their hands up though so you know it’s not on purpose! Rules gurus: how is this play not a moving screen? Drives me crazy.

I call that "The Pitt" and it has always driven me insane.
 

RichZ

Fort the ead!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,236
Reaction Score
22,284
Drives me nuts when there's a defender doing the token pressure thing, backpedaling 8 feet in front of the dribbler and a big steps in an sets a hard screen on him just before half court. It serves no purpose.

In 3 years, I don't think Kemba ever ran backwards into that screen, and I always marveled at his apparently otherworldly peripheral vision. But when you realize how good his peripheral vision is, it explains a lot about his game.
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
I think the NBA added a rule this rule that egregious flops are technicals. I watched 2-3 NBA games a week this year and haven’t seen it called.

Did they change it? It used to be a fine, but this would explain why manu retired.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
2,593
Reaction Score
18,972
I wouldn’t mind if they changed the rules for free throws for people taking the three point shot.

If there is contact from the defender clearly in the act of shooting and the ball hasn’t been released and then it’s three shots.

If Shooter has already released the ball and the defender makes icontact with shooters body or arm then it’s only two shots
 

Dream Jobbed 2.0

“Most definitely”
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
14,848
Reaction Score
55,886
Did they change it? It used to be a fine, but this would explain why manu retired.
I think starting around 2012 if you got caught repeatedly doing it it was a fine. Now it’s a tech
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
I think starting around 2012 if you got caught repeatedly doing it it was a fine. Now it’s a tech

That should’ve happened a decade before that.
 

Dream Jobbed 2.0

“Most definitely”
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
14,848
Reaction Score
55,886
I wouldn’t mind if they changed the rules for free throws for people taking the three point shot.

If there is contact from the defender clearly in the act of shooting and the ball hasn’t been released and then it’s three shots.

If Shooter has already released the ball and the defender makes icontact with shooters body or arm then it’s only two shots
The rule now is that the shot isn’t complete until the shooter lands which is incredibly silly from a basketball standpoint but makes sense when you consider player safety.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,067
Reaction Score
66,188
There was a lot of discussion yesterday about the illegal screen on Sid and how it’s a “point of emphasis” this year to not turn into a defender when you are performing a dribble hand off. A play that drives me crazy every time I see it is when another player, typically the inbounder, acts as a form of an escort for the man bringing the ball up. They will go up the court on the hip of the defender basically using 45 feet of moving screens to get the ball passed halfcourt. They will do it with their hands up though so you know it’s not on purpose! Rules gurus: how is this play not a moving screen? Drives me crazy.

It's not a screen, the escort is entitled to his space on the court as long as he doesn't illegally block the defender. It you enforced that, every offensive player would be constantly fouling on every play.
 

krinklecut

Class of '11
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
1,931
Reaction Score
13,054
This is dumb. Offense needs to move up court and has the right of way in the full court to get to half court. Moving screen is part of an offensive set that starts in the half court.
 

gtcam

Diehard since '65
Joined
Sep 12, 2012
Messages
10,987
Reaction Score
29,041
When I see this they always go in a straight line. The ball handler may move side to side behind them and use them as a screener. If that player going up the court deviates and moves laterally into a defender, that's a moving screen and a foul.

Because the guy is allowed to go down the court to get to the other end. Are you suggesting that he is required to stay under his own basket?


You know what he means
Typically a big is the one who jogs slowly up the court while the dribbler uses the big as a shield
of course if the shield makes contact with the defender trying to get at the dribbler then it should be a callable moving screen - and many times there is contact
This is a tactic that I remember Duke started to use a lot with C. Laetner or Gene Banks and it became popular - UConn rarely used/uses it but some teams do it on a continual basis - if I recollect - Lefty Driesel started it with McMillan and Roy in the early 70s
It bothers me because it takes the ability to pick up 3/4 court pressure tactics away and in reality it is a moving screen because that is exactly what the big is doing - screening the defender away from the ball handler (but not in current basketball rules)
It is a planned tactic in most all cases - most coaches don't really wants the big walking or jogging down to the offensive end
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,958
Reaction Score
208,739
If the defensive player just stopped and set his feet wouldn't the big and/or the guard have to walk around him? I never understood why that tactic was so successful in frustrating pressure.
 
Last edited:

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,015
Reaction Score
82,328
If the defensive player just stopped and set his feet wouldn't the big and/or the guard have to walk around him? I never understood, why that tactic was so successful in frustrating pressure.

Yes. As @gtcam says we all know why it is being done, but it's hard to rule that a player cannot move from the defensive to offensive end.
 

the Q

Yowie Wowie. We’re gonna have so much fun here
Joined
Mar 28, 2017
Messages
7,029
Reaction Score
11,269
Yes. As @gtcam says we all know why it is being done, but it's hard to rule that a player cannot move from the defensive to offensive end.

You can’t run a defender over to do it.
 

Online statistics

Members online
654
Guests online
5,142
Total visitors
5,796

Forum statistics

Threads
156,994
Messages
4,075,895
Members
9,965
Latest member
deltaop99


Top Bottom