Very simple, we are doomed.................................................
Analysts theoretically love UConn in March. Not enough to ever actually pick them in a tournament game, regardless of opponent, but they acknowledge our magic
It must be a weird existence to just make stuff up, and then get angry when your made up stuff doesn't materialize.
Ratings
Oregon State in the field (let alone a 7) was head-scratching to me. I could have seen them in a first four game or maybe one of the other 11 seeds, but a 7 seed completely socked me.
Not sure if there is one accurate statement in this post, outside your opinion of the NCAA I guess.
do you mean the theads who talk about the nba for a living? or the theads who go out of their way to devalue uconn? in 2014 most people had the 10 seed sju beating us.
We got 4 teams in. I think that's enough respect (the SEC ONLY got 3).
We were in regardless based on these seedings Cinci didn't move and Tulsa got in after a beat down by Memphis.
We lose to Cinci we might not be in. The way this team played, getting in was not assured. One way or the other, winning the AAC tournament probably boosted our seeding. We survived a mediocre Memphis team with all of our bigs in trouble. That's probably the last time we can get away with that. We also still have too many possessions that go nowhere. We rely on D, and I can't see us going very far just relying on D. But we get to play, so we'll see.
So your saying Tulsa's resume was better than ours before the AAC quarters on Friday?? That's my point, if you listened to the committee chair or read his comments or even saw the s-curve which is posted in a different thread we were safely in.
