81 in the RPI | Page 2 | The Boneyard

81 in the RPI

Status
Not open for further replies.

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
45,048
Reaction Score
35,678
When you have OOC games against Michigan, Ohio State, Syracuse, Texas, Gonzaga, Georgetown, and Maryland I don't know how you can complain. The RPI formula is a joke that's all, but we've definitely challenged ourselves early.

Complaining about math. Got it.
 
C

Chief00

I agree the sub 300 RPI games destroy the hard earned wins against the top teams RPI wise. With smarter scheduling we could win those games by 20 rather than 40 and have a significantly better RPI.
The challenge would be playing those games at home only. There are economics involved - especially with the current TV deal. Warde can't give up gate receipts, quite frankly.
Personally, I would like UConn to think outside the box that no longer works - and drop nearly all the cupcake games - schedule top teams home and away - and make up revenue by selling out games - we could add 5,000 ticket sales at XL vs against a cupcake. It would also help the TV ratings.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,757
Reaction Score
143,855
Joe Lunardi ‏@ESPNLunardi 8m8 minutes ago
Final seed list of 2015 (CAPS=AQ):
1s: 01-OKLA, 02-MichSt, 03-Kan, 04-Md,
2s: 05-Xav, 06-UVA, 07-Unc, 08-PURD,
3s: 09-IowaSt, 10-UK, 11-Duke, 12-ZONA

Joe Lunardi ‏@ESPNLunardi 6m6 minutes ago
4s: 13-Miami, 14-Butler, 15-NOVA, 16-Lville (SMU, "if")
5s: 17-TexA&M, 18-Iowa, 19-Prov, 20-Wvu,
6s: 21-Pitt, 22-Ore, 23-DAY, 24-Utah

Joe Lunardi ‏@ESPNLunardi 4m4 minutes ago
7s: 25-SoCar, 26-Cinc, 27-Gw, 28-Conn,
8s: 29-Ucla, 30-ZAGA, 31-Baylor, 32-Tex,
9s: 33-Ind, 34-NDame, 35-FlaSt, 36-Vand
10s: 37-Fla, 38-TTech, 39-Colo, 40-Mich

Joe Lunardi ‏@ESPNLunardi 4m4 minutes ago
(L4=Last 4 In): 41-ArizSt (L4), 42-Hall (L4), 43-WICHST, 44-NoIowa(L4),

Others: 45-Monmouth, 46-VALP, 47-MEMP, 48-SDSU, 49-UALR, 50-W&M, 51-AKRON, 52-CHATT, 53-HAW, 54-STONY, 55-BELM, 56-YALE, 57-ODU, 58-HPOINT, 59-WEBER, 60-ARMY, 61-IONA, 62-IPFW, 63-UNF, 64-NMSU, 65-SOUTHERN, 66-SFA, 67-WAGNER, 68-NCA&T.

FIRST OUT: USC, Richmond, Cal, Cuse.
NEXT OUT: UNLV, Wake, StMary, OreSt.
FOUR MORE: StJoe, NW, BYU, OhioSt.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
45,048
Reaction Score
35,678
I agree the sub 300 RPI games destroy the hard earned wins against the top teams RPI wise. With smarter scheduling we could win those games by 20 rather than 40 and have a significantly better RPI.
The challenge would be playing those games at home only. There are economics involved - especially with the current TV deal. Warde can't give up gate receipts, quite frankly.
Personally, I would like UConn to think outside the box that no longer works - and drop nearly all the cupcake games - schedule top teams home and away - and make up revenue by selling out games - we could add 5,000 ticket sales at XL vs against a cupcake. It would also help the TV ratings.

I agree. If UConn wants to sell out the games it does have on its schedule, it needs to give fans a reason to buy season tickets.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
10,785
Reaction Score
36,878
Members of the tournament selection committee have acknowledged that they've shifted more towards computer based metrics(ie guys like Kenpom) and aren't focused as much on RPI as they used to be. I wouldn't get too wrapped up in tracking this every day.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
34,244
Reaction Score
91,908
I agree. If UConn wants to sell out the games it does have on its schedule, it needs to give fans a reason to buy season tickets.

Right, instead they give fans reasons to not buy season tickets.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
13,418
Reaction Score
72,818
Members of the tournament selection committee have acknowledged that they've shifted more towards computer based metrics(ie guys like Kenpom) and aren't focused as much on RPI as they used to be. I wouldn't get too wrapped up in tracking this every day.

Individuals evaluating a team's strength, perhaps, but the information is still organized and framed in a lens of the RPI on their nitty gritty sheet (top 25 RPI wins, record against RPI top 100, etc.).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
332
Guests online
4,086
Total visitors
4,418

Forum statistics

Threads
161,388
Messages
4,261,666
Members
10,099
Latest member
OGAggiesCT


.
..
Top Bottom