- Joined
- Oct 15, 2012
- Messages
- 4,526
- Reaction Score
- 18,162
Even though the announced crowds have gone down. This problem started the last few years they were in the big east.
It was a morgue and people tried to stay positive but man at the end especially people wanted to poke their eyes out.
The last 7 minutes took 35 minutes
August....let me know when you're coming to games.....I'm at all the XL games. Would be great to hang out again.
Im at most of the XL games and some gampels life schedule permitting. Had family in tow last night.
We're always at the Rockinghorse before games.
If true, I'm disappointed. I truly enjoy your spirited defense of the XL and tweaking of those who argue against it.I'm done.
I don't think anyone would argue that attendance would better in the Big East. That concept makes me miss when upstater was trying to argue the AAC was a better basketball conference than the newest Big East.
Maybe someone already knows, but it feels like it's been a long time since the announced attendance at the XL Center for a scheduled regular season game hit this kind of low (I think the first AAC tourney game 2 years ago may have been announced lower).
It's crazy to think about what the atmosphere was like 20 years ago compared to today.
Can you really blame the fans though?
We have had every semblance of a rivalry, which is the lifeblood of college sports, ripped away from us due to no fault of our own. To expect fans to keep showing up to games against teams they have never heard of, and not even beating these teams regularly, is a hard order in a pro sports region.
Yes, and I wasn't trying to say that the issue is unique to UConn. FSU has a good team and they played in front of NO ONE at home against Minnesota on Monday. I was watching LSU last night and the building was completely empty (the game was about the quality of intramural basketball).
The thing is it wasn't THAT long ago when teams that weren't NCAA tournament teams would still have 14-15k in the building for a Fairfield.
It's an epidemic across the sport. A handful of teams now get the top recruits - 95% of the teams play a version of the game that isn't entertaining and the nature of March means that the regular season is meaningless for everyone but 15 bubble teams.
This isn't old man yells at cloud: The sport was a better watch 15-20 years ago.
The lack of attendence at the BU game is simple. This team is simply not good, in fact they are hard to watch more often than not, combined with the fact that it's a game against Boston University on a weeknight in Hartford and it's not hard to see why people are exactly jumping out of their seats.Is this really an AAC thing, though? We have always played games like this. Playing BU is actually a lot closer to the intended college basketball experience than a game against Houston, theoretically.
Perhaps you could argue that the residual effect of playing in the AAC has depressed attendance/excitement, and I would agree, but there are bigger problems at play, the most obvious among them being that this might be our worst team in some time.
And you look at recruiting since Ollie took over...there hasn't really been a drop-off. In fact, it's probably improved, so in a vacuum, the conference shouldn't be effecting the attendance of a non-conference game when the conference hasn't proven to have an effect on the recruiting. We're just bad.
I tend to agree with @whaler11 and @superjohn that this is a combination of A) college basketball not being as compelling a product as it once was, and B) people being less likely to send dollars on spectator sport in this day and age.
The biggest factor, though, is that it's not good to watch. I'm probably going to swallow my better judgement and head to New York on Monday, but this is far from all of those other times - even as recently as a month ago, remarkably - where I would have crawled to the end of the earth to get to the game.
The lack of attendence at the BU game is simple. This team is simply not good, in fact they are hard to watch more often than not, combined with the fact that it's a game against Boston University on a weeknight in Hartford and it's not hard to see why people are exactly jumping out of their seats.
August so fat when he get an extra ticket HE EATS IT!!'Lol.
I actually ate my 4th ticket tonight so I could have an extra seat for roominess. True story. Joke was on me though I could have given it away and had 5 extra seats anyway
,,,knowing it would taste better with ketchup.August so fat when get an extra ticket HE EATS IT...'
August so fat when get an extra ticket HE EATS IT!!'
Yes, and I wasn't trying to say that the issue is unique to UConn. FSU has a good team and they played in front of NO ONE at home against Minnesota on Monday. I was watching LSU last night and the building was completely empty (the game was about the quality of intramural basketball).
The thing is it wasn't THAT long ago when teams that weren't NCAA tournament teams would still have 14-15k in the building for a Fairfield.
It's an epidemic across the sport. A handful of teams now get the top recruits - 95% of the teams play a version of the game that isn't entertaining and the nature of March means that the regular season is meaningless for everyone but 15 bubble teams.
This isn't old man yells at cloud: The sport was a better watch 15-20 years ago.