wire chief
Testmeister
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 5,395
- Reaction Score
- 4,598
I would have rated Plum and Osahor significantly higher. It would be a toss up between Samuelson and Collier for number one. Of the four players, Samuelson has the most upside and probably will be the best player and for that reason I would give the edge to Samuelson and Collier.
They are in alphabetical order by the name of the school.I didn't get the impression that the seven selections were necessarily ranked.
I like your reasoning, but I don't bet on potential. Plum and Osahor are the best duo, alphabetical order or not. Nevertheless, I'm drooling over the "potential" of these two teams meeting in Dallas.I would have rated Plum and Osahor significantly higher. It would be a toss up between Samuelson and Collier for number one. Of the four players, Samuelson has the most upside and probably will be the best player and for that reason I would give the edge to Samuelson and Collier.
Good, well rounded, informative and accurate---I like that Ryan Cooper!!
Numbers are nice----WINS are better!Not a Cuse fan but give credit where credit is due....the numbers of Sykes and Peterson may be the best of all
Katie Lou is definitely UConn's best offensive player. However, Gabby is UConn's best all-around player. They cannot survive without the starting five. Without one the others fall to pieces. The number one recruit amongst a class of four Megan Walker. Also, Andra Espinoza Hunter, Lexi Gordon and Mikayla Coombs.
Yes, he did acknowledge Gabby (and Kia) -- yet he stuck with the tried and true meme "Lou and Nepheesa." Say it enough times and Gabby becomes an afterth0ught.Good, well rounded, informative and accurate---I like that Ryan dCooper!!
When I started i was fearful that he'd concentrate on KLS and Napheesa and ignore Kia and Gabby --but factually he said you could mix and match any of the four as the Uconn go to duo (paraphrasing). I'm sure all Uconn fan would agree as I do.
In articles like this : You can see the glass half full ---or half empty. In terms of Geno, staff, and the larger majority of Uconn fans--do you ever truly believe GABBY shall become an AFTERTHOUGHT???Yes, he did acknowledge Gabby (and Kia) -- yet he stuck with the tried and true meme "Lou and Nepheesa." Say it enough times and Gabby becomes an afterth0ught.
I often re-watch a UCONN game simply to do an "isolation watch" on Gabby. Gabulous is an amazing player. She is no afterthought to me.In articles like this : You can see the glass half full ---or half empty. In terms of Geno, staff, and the larger majority of Uconn fans--do you ever truly believe GABBY shall become an AFTERTHOUGHT???
The moves and abilities of Gabby are amazing for her size--listed at 5'11 inches---smaller I'd say--actually her moves are exceptional for any size. She has developed an outside and occasional 3 --which makes her near impossible to defend.I often re-watch a UCONN game simply to do an "isolation watch" on Gabby. Gabulous is an amazing player. She is no afterthought to me.
I almost jumped up and screamed---U.... C....O....N...N but I couldn't find Teddy's hat.When this article is written next year, besides UConn, the only other team that might be on the list with the same players Duke (others have seniors or redshirts who likely will go pro). UConn's tendem are both sophomores with barely 3 semesters of college play behind them and nearly 5 more in front of them. There's no team in the country that wouldn't swap their tandem for these, if nothing else than because of future play and the near certainty for even better play.
Of course, next year, there's a little matter of Z as well; if it's even possible currently to ignore Kia and esp. Gabby (and the author admits it's not), it almost certainly won't be conceivable next year to ignore Z, so no "talented tandem" article will make sense. UConn will destroy that idea.
I like your reasoning, but I don't bet on potential. Plum and Osahor are the best duo, alphabetical order or not. Nevertheless, I'm drooling over the "potential" of these two teams meeting in Dallas.
Just look at UConn's supporting cast and compare it to Washington's. Which is better? When Lou or Pheesa is having an off quarter or two or get into foul trouble and have to sit, Gabby comes through. Or Saniya. Or Crystal Dangerfield. Or Kia. UConn's philosophy has always been multiple options on the floor so that the opposing defenses can't play off anyone. Not Washington. Now considering minutes, I've mentioned that if Lou played the same number of minutes as Plum perhaps her numbers would be equivalent. Maybe better. But I don't bet on potential. What is, is. What ain't, ain't. Washington has the best scoring duo, as evidenced by the numbers. The best scoring team? The best team? Not at all. Not close.Jordy---i know this is much after you posted your praise of uW duo. Since Stanford was able to shut down, minimize, Osahor--and W lost--even with 44 from Plum--are they still the best Duo in current WBB?
With Napheesa and Katie Lou--they don't put up those number--Geno pulls kls before she can--so far (notice I cover that base) Uconn's Duo have not been shut down. Plum obviously is a scoring machine--
Since you are adamant that Plum and Osahor are the best--or were--does this effect your view???
Just look at UConn's supporting cast and compare it to Washington's. Which is better? When Lou or Pheesa is having an off quarter or two or get into foul trouble and have to sit, Gabby comes through. Or Saniya. Or Crystal Dangerfield. Or Kia. UConn's philosophy has always been multiple options on the floor so that the opposing defenses can't play off anyone. Not Washington. Now considering minutes, I've mentioned that if Lou played the same number of minutes as Plum perhaps her numbers would be equivalent. Maybe better. But I don't bet on potential. What is, is. What ain't, ain't. Washington has the best scoring duo, as evidenced by the numbers. The best scoring team? The best team? Not at all. Not close.
I don't disagree (how can one disagree with facts; or sorry, it's now possible to make up your own facts, but still...) that Washington's tandem is higher scoring, but that's not the headline of the article. It's the most talented tandem. That includes defense, ability to make the rest of the team better, future potential, etc. Is anyone's tandem seriously close to UConn in terms of that type of talent?Just look at UConn's supporting cast and compare it to Washington's. Which is better? When Lou or Pheesa is having an off quarter or two or get into foul trouble and have to sit, Gabby comes through. Or Saniya. Or Crystal Dangerfield. Or Kia. UConn's philosophy has always been multiple options on the floor so that the opposing defenses can't play off anyone. Not Washington. Now considering minutes, I've mentioned that if Lou played the same number of minutes as Plum perhaps her numbers would be equivalent. Maybe better. But I don't bet on potential. What is, is. What ain't, ain't. Washington has the best scoring duo, as evidenced by the numbers. The best scoring team? The best team? Not at all. Not close.
I don't completely disagree. Talent wise Plum is at the top of the class. Lou has the potential to show that she is as talented. Collier is far the better scorer than Osahor in my opinion with the big O the better rebounder. Defensively they're fairly equal so all in all those two are a wash. In my book that makes the Washington duo RIGHT NOW ahead by a whisker. Now, ask me again a year from now.I don't disagree (how can one disagree with facts; or sorry, it's now possible to make up your own facts, but still...) that Washington's tandem is higher scoring, but that's not the headline of the article. It's the most talented tandem. That includes defense, ability to make the rest of the team better, future potential, etc. Is anyone's tandem seriously close to UConn in terms of that type of talent?
There is now however an alternative to alternative facts. Haven't you heard? It's called politics.I don't disagree (how can one disagree with facts; or sorry, it's now possible to make up your own facts, but still...) that Washington's tandem is higher scoring, but that's not the headline of the article. It's the most talented tandem. That includes defense, ability to make the rest of the team better, future potential, etc. Is anyone's tandem seriously close to UConn in terms of that type of talent?