bbsamjj
Rutgers Rooter
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Messages
- 1,117
- Reaction Score
- 4,343
Minus the turnovers both teams played relatively well, given they both seem to be excellent defensive teams. You get the sense though that neither has quite found its groove, which I would say is more concerning for Stanford than Oregon given their (relatively) more experienced lineup.
Something I do wonder for people who follow both teams more closely--there is A LOT of talent on both rosters, enough that it seems both coaches were rotating players in and out constantly. Yet, minus a few players on each team (Williams, Brink, Lexie Hull for Stanford--and you can see the potential in Jones; Paopao, Sabally, despite her flaws, for Oregon), they all seemed a bit interchangeable to me. While that's great from a depth perspective, do you think that hurts from a consistency perspective? In that, you're never quite sure who will show up, and there are almost too many lineup variations to try?
Something I do wonder for people who follow both teams more closely--there is A LOT of talent on both rosters, enough that it seems both coaches were rotating players in and out constantly. Yet, minus a few players on each team (Williams, Brink, Lexie Hull for Stanford--and you can see the potential in Jones; Paopao, Sabally, despite her flaws, for Oregon), they all seemed a bit interchangeable to me. While that's great from a depth perspective, do you think that hurts from a consistency perspective? In that, you're never quite sure who will show up, and there are almost too many lineup variations to try?
Well it was Mechelle doing the Mock draft so I'm not surprised that you are surprised.