- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
- Messages
- 620
- Reaction Score
- 576
yeah, it was addressed already. I was just having fun with our players and some math. I didnt make any assumptions with my calculations and should have in order for it to hold true.I joined the thread extremely late, so forgive me if this has been addressed, but you've proven nothing.
Allow me to get all scientific on you, one scientist to another. You are making an assumption that both running backs are running into a player in exactly the same fashion, and that the only difference is their weights. You and I (and everyone else, I presume) know that the premise is almost never true. The running back position is predicated on vision and actually AVOIDING the hit. Let's keep in mind that you did not calculate the force in Newtons of the opposing linebacker, which would in almost all cases be greater than either running back, resulting in both running backs going backwards irrespective of the difference between the two running backs (since the defensive players will outweigh Hyppolite by about 20 lbs.)!! (Not to mention, how many running backs enter the first hole at top speed?)
In summation, you and I both know that this is not a scientific proof of anything other than the following statement: if the two running backs hit an opposing player in exactly the same manner at exactly the same speed, Hyppolite has an advantage. That is of course true, but that did not require much mathematics...
Just enough physics for the majority of people to get it. Not too much physics to where I get fired at work for doing math calculations all day figuring out what RB at what angle and velocity/acceleration is better hitting a hole. haha.

