Yes, you are correct. Tell me how good were they as sophomores at UConn?
Rip was at 21.5 PPG on 44%, 40%, 84% and averaged about 2.4 APG, 2.2 TPG, 4.4 RPG and 1.5 SPG in 32.5 MPG
Ray was at 21.1 PPG on 49%, 44%, 73% and averaged about 2.3 APG, 2.0 TPG, 6.8 RPG, and 1.9 SPG in 32.8 MPG
Lamb was at 17.7 PPG on 48%, 34%, 81% and averaged 1.7 APG, 2.0 TPG, 4.9 RPG, and 1.7 SPG in 37.2 MPG
As I said, he could benefit from coming back for his junior year just like they did, he is however, not far behind either of them at this point in his career. Sure he isn't a HOF or a MVP or whatever yet, but he has the potential to be as good as either of them and I think has shown that this year. I expect him to get better if he comes back for a third year, but he's on a similar projection to both those players.
BTW Rip couldn't really beat his man off the dribble in the NBA or even really in college. Ray could/can but it isn't/wasn't the main part of his game. Both made careers by playing just like Reggie Miller and working the screens. Both have better screeners in college than Lamb has. Not to mention 3PT%'s are not comparable considering the line was moved back after Rip/Ray left college. 19-9 is much easier than 20-9, though both may be too easy.