Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="tzznandrew, post: 2965412, member: 168"] I first posted these stats back in [URL='https://the-boneyard.com/threads/20-of-the-way-through-the-season.136451/#post-2930895']November, after 6 games[/URL], and now that we're through 12 it seems like a great time to look and see what/if anything has changed. Since that, though, the NET has come out, so I'm adding this to the list. [B]NET[/B] 9. Houston 33. Cincy ---- 56. UCF 77. Temple 83. UConn ---- 101. Tulsa 103. USF 109. Memphis 133. Wichita 150. SMU ---- 240. Tulane 258. ECU [B]Sagarin[/B] 14. Cincy 33. Houston 34. UCF ---- 74. UConn 84. Temple ---- 98. Memphis 110. Wichita 116. SMU 118. Tulsa ---- 177. USF 209. Tulane 244. ECU [B]KenPom[/B] 23. Cincy 36. Houston 44. UCF ---- 78. UConn 82. Temple 94. SMU ---- 111. Wichita 120. Memphis 122. Tulsa ---- 191. USF 215. Tulane 261. ECU [B]BPI[/B] 21. Cincy 30. Houston 37. UCF 55. Temple ---- 76. UConn 85. SMU ---- 129. Tulsa 130. Wichita 143. Memphis ---- 191. USF 226. Tulane 282. ECU [B]Massey[/B] 17. Houston 21. Cincy ---- 52. UCF 55. Temple ---- 89. Wichita 92. UConn 93. Tulsa ---- 117. Memphis 135. USF 137. SMU ---- 203 Tulane 259. ECU So, Cincy has been a big riser pretty much across the board. They all tell the same story, though: Cincy and Houston are pretty much tournament locks provided they don't collapse or have major injuries. Each also has a good shot at a 4 or 5 seed, or maybe a little better. UCF is a bubble team, but right now, by the metrics alone would probably be a 50-50 team. Temple and UConn are both on the outside looking in, probably NIT teams. Tulsa has put itself in the conversation of the NIT. The conference looks balanced, with Cincy and Houston being chances for Q1 wins even at home. Temple and UCF may also be Q1 wins on the road, if you can get them. UConn is close to that line as well, in the NET. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach