- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 751
- Reaction Score
- 926
Nice to see someone defending Uconn for a change. This is more then just a sports issue and thats why i think its more powerful coming from somewhere other then ESPN.
To me, the fact that Nocera didn't know that the NCAA would have issues with Reggie Rose, and that he doesn't admit that there might actually be something to those issues, makes this whole piece, indeed all 3 pieces, just so much nonsense. He is so fixated on badmouthing the NCAA that he doesn't bother with looking at the facts.
Now the NCAA isn't perfect by any stretch, but in this case they are right. Fortunately for Boatright his nightmare is over.
+1These annotations are worth a read as well: http://nocera.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/30/deconstructing-the-boatright-decision/
These annotations are worth a read as well: http://nocera.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/30/deconstructing-the-boatright-decision/
They're right about what? They tear this woman's life apart based on a hunch and then do what? Absolutely nothing. Issue a bitchy press release. Hey, sweetheart, sorry to bother you, thanks for playing, go back to your life. What a joke.
It is funny but he does EXACTLY what he accuses the NCAA of doing. He knows, and the NCAA rule is pretty damned clear, for example that a payment to Ms. Boatright is considered an impermissible payment to Ryan boatright under NCAA rules. Yet there he is saying, "gosh, Ryan didn't get anything. His mother did. the NCAA lied!" And he does it time and time again. And the idea that he had no clue who Rose was or why the NCAA just might have some concerns with his involvement is absolutely mind-boggling. Just to repeat, Reggie Rose travelled for free with memphis while his brother attended. his brother paid someone to take his SATs in order to qualify to play at Memphis. And his 2nd "false claim" seems to be based on what ESPN reported, not what the NCAA said. Yes the wording was not the best in the press release, but that happens all the time. And if you read the entire document, not just one line out of context it is clearer that it meant car payments.A competent reporter, and one has to question whether ESPN has or knows of such, would have asked for a clarification before reporting that Ryan got a car.Here's Nocera's blog post with comments on the NCAA presser - LINK
I know the alleged idea behind the allegation that Reggie Rose is dirty is that he is trying to push Ryan to UConn, or eventually represent him when he is a pro, but really ? REALLY ? The man is the brother of the reigning NBA MVP. Is he honestly going to make a better living off of Ryan Boatright than he can glomming onto his own brother ? Really ? In fact, I find it FAR more likely that Rose is able to help the Boatrights because his ship - so to speak - has ALREADY come in and is making $20 Mil per year in the NBA.To me, the fact that Nocera didn't know that the NCAA would have issues with Reggie Rose, and that he doesn't admit that there might actually be something to those issues, makes this whole piece, indeed all 3 pieces, just so much nonsense. He is so fixated on badmouthing the NCAA that he doesn't bother with looking at the facts.
Now the NCAA isn't perfect by any stretch, but in this case they are right. Fortunately for Boatright his nightmare is over.
You don't seem like a very good UConn fan. Maybe you should find another board to roam.It is funny but he does EXACTLY what he accuses the NCAA of doing. He knows, and the NCAA rule is pretty damned clear, for example that a payment to Ms. Boatright is considered an impermissible payment to Ryan boatright under NCAA rules. Yet there he is saying, "gosh, Ryan didn't get anything. His mother did. the NCAA lied!" And he does it time and time again. And the idea that he had no clue who Rose was or why the NCAA just might have some concerns with his involvement is absolutely mind-boggling. Just to repeat, Reggie Rose travelled for free with memphis while his brother attended. his brother paid someone to take his SATs in order to qualify to play at Memphis. And his 2nd "false claim" seems to be based on what ESPN reported, not what the NCAA said. Yes the wording was not the best in the press release, but that happens all the time. And if you read the entire document, not just one line out of context it is clearer that it meant car payments.A competent reporter, and one has to question whether ESPN has or knows of such, would have asked for a clarification before reporting that Ryan got a car.
As I've said since the beginning, I don't think Boatright knew about most of this stuff, with the obviousl exception of the California trip. he and UCONN got kind of screwed. Essentially, thoguh, Norcera makes all kinds of statements about the case, but provides precious little evidence to support his conclusions. Simply saying "I don't think the NCAA had this, or I doubt the NCAA had that" doesn't qualify as evidence.
aceboon, other than his sayso, how do we know Ms Boatright lost her job over THIS? And what kind of employer would do that anyway? Sometimes things happen to people without a cause-effect relationship, you know. there was a recent matter of a vacine given to children at a certain age and an illness that also develops around that age. there was a great deal of speculation that the vacine CAUSED the illness. Except it didn't further investigation proved. The fact that Ms Boatright got laid off is unfortunate, and as one who has been there it is very unpleasent. But in the current economy, I'd need lots more information beyond Nocera's sayso to believe that one had anything to do with the other.