oldude
bamboo lover
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2016
- Messages
- 19,033
- Reaction Score
- 176,692
He certainly should be under consideration.Based on this criteria, would Smesko be considered as a potential AC?
He certainly should be under consideration.Based on this criteria, would Smesko be considered as a potential AC?
That’s true. Lack of international experience is not the key culprit in favoring older (prior Olympics team) players. It is the lack of practice time for the Olympic pool.Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought USA Basketball using NCAA players during qualifying tournaments was to help get younger players familiar with international play. Is the concern that this doesn't provide enough opportunities for these players to do so?
Whomever the players are on the next WorldThat’s true. Lack of international experience is not the key culprit in favoring older (prior Olympics team) players. It is the lack of practice time for the Olympic pool.
The (prior) selection committees always gravitate toward the “prior existing chemistry” emergency criteria because of the lack of practice time. The selected players must somehow decongest from the ongoing WNBA season and then go 0-100 for the Olympics.
This emergency criteria naturally favors older players, or player combos from the same WNBA teams, who are currently performing well in the WNBA season.
I think the current system for qualifying for the Olympics in 5x5 basketball is AmeriCup => World Cup => Olympics.Whomever the players are on the next World
Fiba championship team, probably at least 10 of the 12 spots will be the same.