16 groups of 3 make so little sense. It would be a return to the disaster that happened before the field of 32 took place, when it was just 24 teams, and teams would collude in the 3rd game to help each other out while leaving someone else out (Germany/Austria did it to leave out Algeria as the most famous example).Fascinated to see what the format will be with 48 teams - don't love the early rumors of 16 groups of 3 with the top 2 moving on into a round of 32. In regard to the MNT coach, all I can say is that no manager should be in charge for more than 1 WC cycle.
This is all good though, right? Being the most popular sport in the world, spread the wealth a bit more...You've got your Brazil, Argentina, Germany, France, Italy...they're like the P2 of soccer. Speaking of which, what is going on with the Azzurri?
I was traveling in Italy I think it was 1995 and I got to see Batistuta play for Fiorentina. At night they would show Juventus, Roberto Baggio was playing. There was some big dude with gray hair on the team that was a scorer, by googling Juventus I think it was Fabrizio Ravanelli. I remember thinking cool, I get to watch Baggio but this guy was doing the scoring.The Azzurri are fine. They went through a revamping of the team and won the Euros. Lost some guys due to injury and just could not dig themselves out of the hole to qualify. With that said only one of Portugal or Italy would have qualified if Italy did not lose to North Macedonia in qualifications. Italy should be back in the WC for 2026, they have a ton of younger talent currently, but by 2026 they should be very well seasoned and potentially on their last go round as a team unit.
16 groups of 3 make so little sense. It would be a return to the disaster that happened before the field of 32 took place, when it was just 24 teams, and teams would collude in the 3rd game to help each other out while leaving someone else out (Germany/Austria did it to leave out Algeria as the most famous example).
Just make it 12 groups of 4. Top 2 teams in each group advance and the 8 best 3rd place teams for 32. Or, just have the 12 first-place teams and the 4 best 2nd place for 16.
I mean, 48 will be watered down even more than what we have now. Just look at that 6-1 beatdown yesterday (Switzerland v Portugal or Spain beating Costa Rica 7-1 or Brazil/S. Korea) and adding 16 more teams is just going to make those more frequent. In most years, is the next best Asian, Oceania, or Concaf team really going to do anything of interest or perform better than the Asian, Oceania, or Concaf teams already playing? I mean other than just being punching bags? Yes, those extra 16 will sometimes include good teams that were left out like Italy, Chile, Colombia, and Nigeria, and a few others who may very well have done something this year had it been made of 48 teams, but you are also including a lot of lesser-quality teams and I am not sure adding 10-12 extra bad teams makes up for the fact that 4-6 might be legit good.
Hope so.Big day tomorrow.
Will the world get Arg-Brazil semi final?