2025 Updated Recruiting Targets | Page 2 | The Boneyard

2025 Updated Recruiting Targets

awy

Joined
May 23, 2024
Messages
214
Reaction Score
1,079
The really bright ones will see the Castle blueprint and see the forest through the trees, even if they are a top 10-15 recruit.
i mean they'll get their share of top 10 guys, but as far as asking the top guys to take a lot less money, a lot harder of an ask. although certainly still possible for the right type of families. incidentally I think the sons of NBA players are good for this. statistically they are the biggest overperformers too.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2023
Messages
1,477
Reaction Score
7,881
i mean they'll get their share of top 10 guys, but as far as asking the top guys to take a lot less money, a lot harder of an ask. although certainly still possible for the right type of families. incidentally I think the sons of NBA players are good for this. statistically they are the biggest overperformers too.
It’s a 12 month or so view compared to a 10 plus year view. The guys that develop and go higher in the draft and get a second contract would be expected to make more realistically, wouldn’t they? Hurley hasn’t been here long enough to have the track record of the second contract yet, but few can reasonably argue that Hawkins, Castle, and Clingan didn’t develop in such a way as to get drafted higher than their recruiting rankings might have suggested. Compare the contract Castle got with someone drafted say 12th or 15th. Then compare that to the possibility of leaving a few hundred grand of NIL money on the table.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
1,496
Reaction Score
16,112
I don't think we have been recruiting him at all, probably since he went west. We are definitely not entertaining the $3-$5 million Dybantsa is reportedly going to be offered by BYU for 1 year.
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
14,969
Reaction Score
84,289
I agree with this except exactly the opposite.
I was thinking the same thing reading his post.

Aren't players like Dybantsa expected to make so much money in the NBA that getting $2, or $3, or even $4 million in his 1 year in college not going to make much of a difference? Might as well go to the school that is going to set you up best for the NBA, rather than going for the most NIL.

If you're a prospect that doesn't have such a clear path to the NBA then you should maximize your earnings as much as you can in college. $2 million for the #100 rated prospect might be the most money he's going to earn in his professional basketball career.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
13,664
Reaction Score
91,697
I was thinking the same thing reading his post.

Aren't players like Dybantsa expected to make so much money in the NBA that getting $2, or $3, or even $4 million in his 1 year in college not going to make much of a difference? Might as well go to the school that is going to set you up best for the NBA, rather than going for the most NIL.

If you're a prospect that doesn't have such a clear path to the NBA then you should maximize your earnings as much as you can in college. $2 million for the #100 rated prospect might be the most money he's going to earn in his professional basketball career.
I can see both sides but I agree with @Huskyforlife. Dybantsa is going #1 overall or at the very least top 5 whether he goes to UConn, Duke, or Stonehill. He's going to make a ton of money but an extra $5M is still nothing to sneeze at.

The lower ranked guys I think are the ones who should be prioritizing development. Take Nick Timberlake and Cam Spencer last year. One cashed in a paycheck and the other is killing it in the NBA summer league.

Obviously not as simple as reversing those decisions and Timberlake is in the NBA, but I think UConn has a good track record now of getting guys completely off the NBA radar chances
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2023
Messages
1,477
Reaction Score
7,881
I was thinking the same thing reading his post.

Aren't players like Dybantsa expected to make so much money in the NBA that getting $2, or $3, or even $4 million in his 1 year in college not going to make much of a difference? Might as well go to the school that is going to set you up best for the NBA, rather than going for the most NIL.

If you're a prospect that doesn't have such a clear path to the NBA then you should maximize your earnings as much as you can in college. $2 million for the #100 rated prospect might be the most money he's going to earn in his professional basketball career.
Not to mention a giant shoe deal that will also dwarf the size of that NIL. Hell Caitlin Clark got a $20 million deal. And that’s just one endorsement opportunity.
 

awy

Joined
May 23, 2024
Messages
214
Reaction Score
1,079
well when you get high enough, you also have higher leverage to get present day money. when you are too low to get a shot in the league, then you just want to do 5 years of college and get money. it's pretty complex but everyone is right.
 

Huskyforlife

Akokbouk
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
12,312
Reaction Score
50,450
I was thinking the same thing reading his post.

Aren't players like Dybantsa expected to make so much money in the NBA that getting $2, or $3, or even $4 million in his 1 year in college not going to make much of a difference? Might as well go to the school that is going to set you up best for the NBA, rather than going for the most NIL.

If you're a prospect that doesn't have such a clear path to the NBA then you should maximize your earnings as much as you can in college. $2 million for the #100 rated prospect might be the most money he's going to earn in his professional basketball career.
All the schools set him up for the NBA, he’ll go first overall if he picks CCSU. The kid won’t fail at the NBA level because he picked a bad college coach or system. So why not maximize earning potential?

I don’t think people realize how special this guy is.
 

Edward Sargent

Sargelak
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
3,799
Reaction Score
9,644
I think in the long-term there needs to be either bonuses for playing well or minimum performances to get your money. The latter would be tricky. There's just too many players getting huge $ that suck. I'd be pissed off if I was a donor giving more than 10 bucks a month to SC

Imagine if McNeeley had a contract where if he comes in and the team makes the sweet-16, he gets extra. Or if he averages less than 30% from 3 he won't get a certain amount of $.

Of course there are A LOT of things I'm not thinking of. But I do think we need a system where kids get money for college performances and not what they did in hs.
Might as well teach them about real life sooner rather than later!
 
Joined
Feb 9, 2023
Messages
744
Reaction Score
2,026
I don't think we have been recruiting him at all, probably since he went west. We are definitely not entertaining the $3-$5 million Dybantsa is reportedly going to be offered by BYU for 1 year.
Not a Uconn guy, hard pass
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
541
Reaction Score
890
The Sleepers podcast did a short piece on AJs recruitment recently and talked about how weird it’s been, as he doesn’t talk to anyone, his dad does. They mentioned a quote from AJ around UConn where they offered him early, but then never reached out since. How do you know a kid is a fit if his dad does all the talking? My sense with him aligns with some recent quotes from Hurley where he said the challenge now that we are the shiney program is to keep getting the guys that fit the ilk, and not fall for the shiney recruit. I get a sense that everything is intentional with Hurley - if you want to come win, and get better, you come to us. If we have to chase you, if you’re an odd bird or it appears your singular goal is a bag on your way to the NBA, you’re not for us. I get the feeling this applies to Dysbantsa. He’s also bounced from team to team at the HS level. I don’t think there is a program in the country that puts more emphasis on character right now than Hurley’s and this guy doesn’t seem to fit the bill. And I love him for it.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
3,587
Reaction Score
11,913
The Sleepers podcast did a short piece on AJs recruitment recently and talked about how weird it’s been, as he doesn’t talk to anyone, his dad does. They mentioned a quote from AJ around UConn where they offered him early, but then never reached out since. How do you know a kid is a fit if his dad does all the talking? My sense with him aligns with some recent quotes from Hurley where he said the challenge now that we are the shiney program is to keep getting the guys that fit the ilk, and not fall for the shiney recruit. I get a sense that everything is intentional with Hurley - if you want to come win, and get better, you come to us. If we have to chase you, if you’re an odd bird or it appears your singular goal is a bag on your way to the NBA, you’re not for us. I get the feeling this applies to Dysbantsa. He’s also bounced from team to team at the HS level. I don’t think there is a program in the country that puts more emphasis on character right now than Hurley’s and this guy doesn’t seem to fit the bill. And I love him for it.
Interesting you say this because remember how Hurley and his staff don't want helicopter parents? I can't see Hurley all that enthusiastic about having to talk only to the father.

Hurley wants to stay with what got him the 2 championships. He will go after more top 5-star players than ever before, but not to the point it comprises team cohesion towards the championship goals.
 

awy

Joined
May 23, 2024
Messages
214
Reaction Score
1,079
uconn is the best destination for AJ development wise because as a wing creator at the next level learning how to operate within a complex offense is immensely valuable. he can create the advantage, and turning that advantage into the most team level production is an elite level swing skill that can be developed in the uconn offense. players need to understand that they don't develop from touches, but from being challenged and learning new stuff. there's no program that does this better than uconn.

but it's whatever. from a roster / resource management standpoint they don't need him. nate ament is basically going to give you the same thing given some more physical development, is a better shooter, and actually better defender with said physical development.
 

Online statistics

Members online
228
Guests online
1,651
Total visitors
1,879

Forum statistics

Threads
158,012
Messages
4,130,974
Members
10,016
Latest member
RipBenEmek


Top Bottom