- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 4,802
- Reaction Score
- 9,118
Boise St football has grown with the city and surrounds since WW2. As Jim wrote, all oars have been rowing on the same stroke.
Boise is a great destination, and they treat their FB'ers really well. No academic pressure, local heroes, usually great coaching, blue Turf was awesome(do they still have it?). Urban enough to be fun, physical geography is breathtaking. Tough to get there, but worth the trip.Someone explain Boise State's success in today's college football. Location is rural and remote, can't be a ton of in-state talent, and how can it compete on NIL with the big boys? Yet, despite all that it's a perennial Top 20 program and was in the CFB playoffs last year.
I thought it was WyomingHCJM lives in Idaho.
Sun Valley, Idaho... But let's be honest, he lives in Connecticut now and has a house in Idaho.I thought it was Wyoming
Boise is a young and vibrant city. Awesome place. Not a large city by any stretch of the imagination.Boise is not small as there are about 240k in Boise and about 450k in the metro area and growing. Boise is focused on winning and everyone is aligned to make that happen.
Not that it matters in anyway but I would be very surprised if the defined "metro area" for Boise was smaller than the entire size of CTBoise is a young and vibrant city. Awesome place. Not a large city by any stretch of the imagination.
They have exclusive rights to use blue turf.Boise is a great destination, and they treat their FB'ers really well. No academic pressure, local heroes, usually great coaching, blue Turf was awesome(do they still have it?). Urban enough to be fun, physical geography is breathtaking. Tough to get there, but worth the trip.
They have exclusive rights to use blue turf.
newhavenchargers.com
That's just false. Any school may use any color they want.They have exclusive rights to use blue turf.
It's in between what each of you said. Just Google it. SUNY Morrisville dared them to sue with a black field and Boise didn'tThat's just false. Any school may use any color they want.
Besides New Haven, University of New England in Maine and Luther College in Iowa also have blue turf.
Sounds like good news for a scrappy, up and coming Independent program that has a chip on its shoulder.College football's dynasty era is over, and the sport is better because of it
Dan Wolken
Sun, Oct 19, 2025, 1:40 PM EDT
Welcome to the new era of college football. We’ve known it and we’ve seen it, but as we reach the second half of the 2025 season, the impact of movement through the transfer portal, player compensation and an expanded playoff field have changed the sport in previously inconceivable ways.
Outside of Ohio State and maybe Alabama (at least until the next loss), every one of the sport’s traditional blue bloods wakes up today in some stage of an existential crisis. Meanwhile, Indiana is the nation’s No. 2 team, Georgia Tech is looking increasingly like a favorite to make the CFP and ESPN’s "College GameDay" is rightfully headed to Missouri at Vanderbilt next weekend.
![]()
College football's dynasty era is over, and the sport is better because of it
Parity reigns in college football, as evidenced by ASU's high-wire win over Texas Tech. This is now a year-to-year, week-to-week enterprise and nothing in American sports is delivering more drama for a wider array of teams and fan bases.sports.yahoo.com
The portal has been very positive for UConn football.Sounds like good news for a scrappy, up and coming Independent program that has a chip on its shoulder.
Definitely been a net positive for us. I said when it first started that we'd lose some good players, but we could easily reload with players that either graduated or want more playing time. Mora has shown he knows how to keep the team competetive in today's game.The portal has been very positive for UConn football.
Yeah, they screwed up. I didn't love Franklin, but he's better than most of the potential candidates mentioned for the Penn State job. Firing Franklin in-season likely resulted in a worse record, higher buyout and loss of a top recruiting class. I know Franklin never won the big one, but the timing and consequences of his firing wasn't well thought out.I'm wondering if schools will rethink the timing of coach firings after what is happening at Penn State. The recruiting class has been blown up for this year and next year. For 2027, Penn St. had the #1 RB, #8 OT, #14 WR, and the #11 CB and all have decommited. And, they have had 10 decommits from the 2026 class. If they waited until the end of the year and hired a coach quickly, they may have saved the classes. Now, there is too much time for the recruits to commit elsewhere.
Firing a coach mid-season only makes sense if there is a favored candidate who does not currently have a job. Otherwise, you might as well wait IMO.Yeah, they screwed up. I didn't love Franklin, but he's better than most of the potential candidates mentioned for the Penn State job. Firing Franklin in-season likely resulted in a worse record, higher buyout and loss of a top recruiting class. I know Franklin never won the big one, but the timing and consequences of his firing wasn't well thought out.
I don't know all the timing regs but the new coach will likely bring some of his own players and recruits, won't he? You lose some, you win some. Here's an interesting take by a Penn State site. Clark Lea is a Vandy almnus but I'm not sure Vandy could compete regularly in the SEC. Extremely costly for Penn State no matter which route they goYeah, they screwed up. I didn't love Franklin, but he's better than most of the potential candidates mentioned for the Penn State job. Firing Franklin in-season likely resulted in a worse record, higher buyout and loss of a top recruiting class. I know Franklin never won the big one, but the timing and consequences of his firing wasn't well thought out.
TBH after saturday I thought O'Brien was going the way of Charlie WeisWE can be the team that ultimately gets Mike Norvell fired!
If he has JMU still rolling in 2 years he will be getting talked about for a B1G job.what about Bob Chesney for Penn State???
Remember the days we lauded for him.
A few years too soon for the Virginia Tech job about 2 hours down I-81 from JMU?If he has JMU still rolling in 2 years he will be getting talked about for a B1G job.
I think he gets at least one more year. He's a good coach, but BC has been bad for long and it's going to take some time to build up that foundation. I mean look at UConn, it took us years to bounce back from bad HC hires.TBH after saturday I thought O'Brien was going the way of Charlie Weis
It did? Mora made us immediately better in year one playing without a real QB.I think he gets at least one more year. He's a good coach, but BC has been bad for long and it's going to take some time to build up that foundation. I mean look at UConn, it took us years to bounce back from bad HC hires.
There are no excuses in the transfer portal era. And look at what Cig is doing at Indiana. Mora literally took us from 1-11 to 6-7. Two years later we're 9-4...I think he gets at least one more year. He's a good coach, but BC has been bad for long and it's going to take some time to build up that foundation. I mean look at UConn, it took us years to bounce back from bad HC hires.
true…but year 2, Mora’s team regressed. He came back in year 3. This is year 2 for BOB.It
It did? Mora made us immediately better in year one playing without a real QB.
If UConn were in the ACC or another P4 Jim Mora would have done even better. bcu has all the financial and competitive advantages of ACC membership.true…but year 2, Mora’s team regressed. He came back in year 3. This is year 2 for BOB.
But…he does seem to struggle with QB play. He seems to have a quick trigger. Last year he benched Castellanos…who then transferred to FSU. This year he benched Alabama transfer Lonergan..who I thought looked decent.
Actually..I wonder if Lonergan transfers again….could be a UConn option.
Yes we got worse after PP because we compounded it with another bad hire then after BD we doubled down with RE 2.0. Let's not lump all 3 crappy hires into one. 13 years (or however long it was) after RE 1.0 is nowhere close to immediately betterIt
It did? Mora made us immediately better in year one playing without a real QB.
So your theory is that it would have been easier, not harder, for Mora to turn us around if there had only been one bad hire before him? That’s a truly odd theory.Yes we got worse after PP because we compounded it with another bad hire then after BD we doubled down with RE 2.0. Let's not lump all 3 crappy hires into one. 13 years (or however long it was) after RE 1.0 is nowhere close to immediately better