2024 Recruiting: Tarris Reed Jr. | Page 8 | The Boneyard

2024 Recruiting: Tarris Reed Jr.

He is so, so far worse than Sanogo was at the same age it’s actually insane that I even have to defend that.
this is a video from his junior year in high school. When he was ranked above Clingan nationally. Look at his fluidity with the ball at just :25 seconds in. Now imagine that he is currently 6-10 265 with 74 inch wingspan AND that a coaching staff known for hard work and getting most of his players is going to get to develop these talents in a system made for an athletic big body. Raw talent-wise, he is not far behind Sanogo.
 
Did Clingan have a bad game because Edey scored 37?

Did we not have any stars because nobody scored 20 a game?

Is Castle a poor defender because he didn’t have a lot of steals?

Context matters.
Do you not understand statistics? Michigan, a bad team, was worse with Reed on the floor than they were with him off. There is your context. Edey scored 37, but UConn as a team did well with Clingan in the floor.

Let’s pick a random Big East center. Jalen Thomas from Butler. Do you consider him worthy of him starting for UConn? Because he was much better than Tarris Reed.

Im done derailing the thread and I apologize for doing so, but it is crazy that we can’t critique anyone without an army of people using zero statistical evidence to the contrary.
 
As some appear to be taking liberties on rating a kid that they know little about and others are showing receipts on prior commentary that people may now prefer to strike from the record I believe that a little more open minded thought on the kids our staff is pursuing and a bit of faith that the staff may actually know what they are doing is in order. Below is a copy of a post I made in the thread announcing Joey C's commitment (along with a link to the thread) when it appeared to me some were overreacting to giving a scholarship to someone who from what they read and/or saw, didn't belong on this level.

I'm sticking with "if our staff is interested in this kid, I believe he can help us".

Joey C Commitment thread
JC Commit.jpg
 
.-.
Do you not understand statistics? Michigan, a bad team, was worse with Reed on the floor than they were with him off. There is your context. Edey scored 37, but UConn as a team did well with Clingan in the floor.

Let’s pick a random Big East center. Jalen Thomas from Butler. Do you consider him worthy of him starting for UConn? Because he was much better than Tarris Reed.

Im done derailing the thread and I apologize for doing so, but it is crazy that we can’t critique anyone without an army of people using zero statistical evidence to the contrary.

I have enough of an understanding to know that on-off stats need to be taken with an ocean of salt because they reflect the players he’s in with as much as they do him. You need a large sample size and you also need to consider all of the various combinations in order to come to helpful conclusions. You didn’t do that. You made your mind up based on a single meaningless stat.

You’re totally dismissing the fact that he played for Juwan Howard and was put in a position to fail. It’s weird and why you’re on an island.
 
I don’t understand how some of you people just watched the most beautiful offense in the sport and say “yeah you know what would be better? Playing a career 11% 3 point shooter at the 4”
It was a beautiful offense this year, a joy to watch, and I do not think SJ at the 4 would have made it better. You misunderstood my post, and maybe some others did too. I was simply suggesting that next year, if SJ develops his game during this offseason and can earn time at the 4 it would help his draft status, if that is even a thing. I mentioned the fact that Hurley had him competing with Karaban last year at the 4. How he would have been used I don't know. Where you get the 11% career on 3's I don't know either; how many has he even shot in the last 3 years. Lastly, don't be ignorant and attack other people when maybe it is your comprehension which may be lacking.
 
I’ll be the one to go out on limb. I think he’s very talented and was poorly coached. He’ll do big things here.

He’s got obvious touch, skill and physical gifts. Not much more you can ask for.

I've watched 4 Michigan games today (thanks strep throat) on double speed. FT shooting is a concern but everything else is what we want. He's not Donovan or Sanogo but he's a legit top-25 starting center with the right coaching.
 
I think that’s basically what bendm was saying. If he gets stronger and stays on the floor, he’ll produce. But he’s not gonna remind anyone of Kyle Filipowski.
Filipowski Min 30.4, Reb. 8.3, FG% 50%, 3pt% 35%, Foul% 67%.
Reed Min 26.5, Reb 7.2, FG% 52%, 3pt% 33%, Foul % 59%.

Rebounding and shooting %'s are pretty similar and Filipowski had a much better supporting cast and coach. Reed listed 2 inches shorter and 15lbs heavier but both seem about same in agility/movement.
 
Could be those are the same people who believed Coach Hurley when he said Samson had wall potential.

Obviously Clingan showed massive potential as Adama's backup. But there were plenty of doubters as to whether he could be as effective as a starter with twice the # of minutes. Do we really know whether Samson has peaked or if he has another level to reach and more skills to showcase given an increased role?
We don't know any of that, and everyone here has their opinions on whether it's possible. But what should be objectively clear is that success is coming at the 5 position and not the 4
 
Do you not understand statistics? Michigan, a bad team, was worse with Reed on the floor than they were with him off. There is your context. Edey scored 37, but UConn as a team did well with Clingan in the floor.

Let’s pick a random Big East center. Jalen Thomas from Butler. Do you consider him worthy of him starting for UConn? Because he was much better than Tarris Reed.

Im done derailing the thread and I apologize for doing so, but it is crazy that we can’t critique anyone without an army of people using zero statistical evidence to the contrary.
I just think you're discounting what a lack of structure can do to a talented kids development. Nobody is saying he was great at Michigan, but there's no doubt there's raw talent to mold here, and he won't be asked to provide Sanogo or Clingan level impact from day 1. I wouldn't even be surprised if he comes off the bench to start.
 
.-.
Let’s pick a random Big East center. Jalen Thomas from Butler. Do you consider him worthy of him starting for UConn? Because he was much better than Tarris Reed.
Well I guess that the mojo that the staff uses when they throw darts at the board to pick transfers is off. Maybe Danny wasn't wearing the proper lucky dartboard-throwing underwear. Too bad it didn't come up "Jalen Thomas."
 
Yeah, so why was Samson nearly the starter over Karaban two years ago? I don't think we've really seen his whole game, Hurley keeps his players in their roles. Plus, there is the whole offseason here for SJ to work on his game. See what happens, I'm rooting for him.
Probably because Karaban was a freshman and Hurley has been pretty consistent in talking about how high he believes Samsons talent was (especially around that time). Has Karaban and Castle been the only two regular freshmen starters? I feel like if you’re going to start as a freshman for Hurley he wants you to show why he can’t justify putting you on the bench.
 
Probably because Karaban was a freshman and Hurley has been pretty consistent in talking about how high he believes Samsons talent was (especially around that time). Has Karaban and Castle been the only two regular freshmen starters? I feel like if you’re going to start as a freshman for Hurley he wants you to show why he can’t justify putting you on the bench.
From what I’ve seen Johnson do this year I have to think he had a good portion of that game last year. Alex had one semester in the program. Given what we’ve seen from him, I’m sure they liked his game and had a plan to play both. But SJ got injured and by the time he was ready to play, the rotation had been set, and the team was being very successful. So he got sub rotation minutes.
 
Donovan Clingan turning pro was not a surprise to us let alone the UConn staff. They have known they were bringing in a transfer center since Ngongba turned them down.

This is the guy they determined they want for their locker room and their system. They are coming off two national titles. We should very much want them to get their primary targets (even if Cam Spencer worked out better).
 
I’ve been reading up on Reed and he sounds like a smart, coachable kid with involved parents. Not the entitled type. Started basketball later in life than most, and based on highlights I’ve watched, has a lot more to get out of his frame and athleticism with some better coaching and conditioning. If Hurley and his staff made this guy a top priority, count me in.

 
I just think you're discounting what a lack of structure can do to a talented kids development. Nobody is saying he was great at Michigan, but there's no doubt there's raw talent to mold here, and he won't be asked to provide Sanogo or Clingan level impact from day 1. I wouldn't even be surprised if he comes off the bench to start.
This. Coaching is the difference between Jalen Adams and Tristen Newton
 
Last edited:
.-.
Do you not understand statistics? Michigan, a bad team, was worse with Reed on the floor than they were with him off. There is your context. Edey scored 37, but UConn as a team did well with Clingan in the floor.

Let’s pick a random Big East center. Jalen Thomas from Butler. Do you consider him worthy of him starting for UConn? Because he was much better than Tarris Reed.

Im done derailing the thread and I apologize for doing so, but it is crazy that we can’t critique anyone without an army of people using zero statistical evidence to the contrary.
+/- is the worst statistic you can use for an individual player, especially in college with 1001 variables.
 
On a per minute basis and percentage basis Sanogo was way better come on don’t be obtuse. Sanogo was a clear future star from day 1, Michigan fans don’t even care that Reed is transferring. I’m not hating on the kid. I’m literally just looking at what he has done. He was on a bad team that was still worse with him on the floor. Hes a former top 40 kid so I get the draw from that standpoint, but he is not good right now. @auror’s first post shows that
I love poster like you who are second guessing the best staff in the current college basketball era. You should be re adjusting your personal statistical models based on who this staff is targeting / recruiting. Just throw your own stuff out the window..
 
I love poster like you who are second guessing the best staff in the current college basketball era. You should be re adjusting your personal statistical models based on who this staff is targeting / recruiting. Just throw your own stuff out the window..
There’s no point to a message board if every post is just “trust the staff.” You’re not here earnestly to read that over and over. It’s fun to have talks and arguments about this kinda thing, it’s okay to disagree or bring up perceived flaws in a recruits ability without saying the staff are morons.
 
There’s no point to a message board if every post is just “trust the staff.” You’re not here earnestly to read that over and over. It’s fun to have talks and arguments about this kinda thing, it’s okay to disagree or bring up perceived flaws in a recruits ability without saying the staff are morons.
Yeah, I agree. No one is infallible including this staff. This staff has been incredible in talent evaluation and development. I don't think anyone thought that Joey C and Diarra (this year) would have been the impact players they became. No matter how great they are at it (talent eval), they were definitely wrong on Timberlake. Maybe he would've been better at UConn, but I don't think he would have been that much better. We really dodged the bullet on that one.
 
You don't teach size and his kind of movement at that size. He would clog up the middle and can be a good center. What's not to like? Some of you are over thinking this.
Yeah, I don't think Reed is gonna be a bust. It looks like we have a lot of options at the 5 and UConn has prioritized Reed, so obviously they see something they can work with. Also, its a potential 2 year rental.
 
.-.
Are we sure Johnson is coming back? Would Reed make more sense as a Johnson « replacement « ?
 
Filipowski Min 30.4, Reb. 8.3, FG% 50%, 3pt% 35%, Foul% 67%.
Reed Min 26.5, Reb 7.2, FG% 52%, 3pt% 33%, Foul % 59%.

Rebounding and shooting %'s are pretty similar and Filipowski had a much better supporting cast and coach. Reed listed 2 inches shorter and 15lbs heavier but both seem about same in agility/movement.

Can’t tell if you’re joking. First, I was talking about Samson. Second, Reed shot 33% because he made 1 out of 3 (Filipowski made 39 out of 112).
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,205
Messages
4,556,851
Members
10,442
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom