2024-2025 transfer portal
- Thread starter Geew1992
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2015
- Messages
- 6,851
- Reaction Score
- 38,450
lol… a little early
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2015
- Messages
- 1,494
- Reaction Score
- 7,742
What in the world? She started with us, left for TX, then left for FL.
I don't understand.
southie
Longhorn Lover
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2012
- Messages
- 3,128
- Reaction Score
- 7,136
The only thing I can come up with is not being in agreement with head coach's decisions; might not even be game-related as this season isn't even underway yet.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2024
- Messages
- 112
- Reaction Score
- 405
The word on the street is she faced some internal disciplinary issues but dont know specifics
I wonder if she heads to Auburn to reunite with her former Coach Johnnie Harris
- Joined
- May 1, 2020
- Messages
- 8,608
- Reaction Score
- 27,670
Interesting tidbit from Talia Goodman here. The number in the Top 100 category is decreasing it seems.
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2015
- Messages
- 1,494
- Reaction Score
- 7,742
The class of 2023 has only been around one year. There could be more movement from that group this spring.
What would be a better comparison would be how many of the classes of 2021 and 2022 transferred after their first year to see if it compares more closely to the current rate of the 2023 class.
- Joined
- May 1, 2020
- Messages
- 8,608
- Reaction Score
- 27,670
Hence why I said "it seems". There was small decrease between 2021 and 2022. I agree it's hard to gauge 2023 just yet, but the trend will be something to watch.
BRS24
LisaG
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,291
- Reaction Score
- 34,274
A while back, I looked at the top 25 players in the classes of 2019 to 2023. I did not limit it to transfers only after first year and did not count the 2nd transfer for some of these (stated below), as it would skew the percentage:
2019 - 14, 56% (19 if you count 5 that transferred 2x)
2020 - 17, 68% (23, as 6 transfered 2x)
2021 - 12, 48% (no double transfers yet)
2022 - 12, 48% (no double transfers yet)
2023 - 2, 8% (no double transfers yet)
- Joined
- May 1, 2020
- Messages
- 8,608
- Reaction Score
- 27,670
Very interesting. Thanks for sharing this.
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2015
- Messages
- 1,494
- Reaction Score
- 7,742
I think it will likely go down from the 21 and 22 classes. The pandemic messed up visits, evaluations, and some team building opportunities. My cynjcal self just thinks too many kids now walk at the drop of a hat.
- Joined
- May 1, 2020
- Messages
- 8,608
- Reaction Score
- 27,670
I hear you. Time will tell if these numbers further confirm your sense of the situation.
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2011
- Messages
- 8,380
- Reaction Score
- 28,805
That would be interesting development. Not many would go that route, but it is interesting.
I don’t like that JUCO thing. Imagine a two year JUCO kid coming to a division 1 program and redshirting a couple of years. You have a scenario where you have 25 and 26 year olds competing against 18 and 19 year olds. No good. The NCAA should at least pretend the goal behind athletic scholarships is to receive a 4 year degree.
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2024
- Messages
- 117
- Reaction Score
- 574
Kids go juco because they do not meet NCAA eligibility requirements. This rule will simply force the NCAA to remove any eligibility requirements and allow all kids entrance into the college no matter what their ACT, SAT, or GPA is. Graduation rates will plummet, not that anyone cares.
- Joined
- May 1, 2020
- Messages
- 8,608
- Reaction Score
- 27,670
This talking point was brought up recently with respect to Prince at TCU. It didn't work out in her favour when they played and lost to South Carolina. International players, especially in Europe do this all the time. Look at Malonga of France who is 19 years old. Or Quinonez who has committed to UConn. This narrative doesn't play out like people think it does.
- Joined
- May 1, 2020
- Messages
- 8,608
- Reaction Score
- 27,670
Diego Pavia court ruling another potentially massive blow for NCAA — 'It's not going to end until we collectively bargain'
The 30,000-foot view of the Pavia decision: It not only paves the way for all junior college players to gain an additional year, but it may invite even more legal challenges over the NCAA's eligibility rules.
The junior college situation isn't changing just yet. The tweet posted earlier may be misinterpreting a recent court decision. It relates to a QB from Vanderbilt who is challenging the eligibility rule. Currently he's exempt but the rule remains in place for everyone else.
Question is how the NCAA decides to move forward. Do they cave like they have with other court rulings or do they try to fight this?
Thank you for doing some digging. I guess that's y u can't trust Twitter.
Diego Pavia court ruling another potentially massive blow for NCAA — 'It's not going to end until we collectively bargain'
The 30,000-foot view of the Pavia decision: It not only paves the way for all junior college players to gain an additional year, but it may invite even more legal challenges over the NCAA's eligibility rules.sports.yahoo.com
The junior college situation isn't changing just yet. The tweet posted earlier may be misinterpreting a recent court decision. It relates to a QB from Vanderbilt who is challenging the eligibility rule. Currently he's exempt but the rule remains in place for everyone else.
Question is how the NCAA decides to move forward. Do they cave like they have with other court rulings or do they try to fight this?
- Joined
- May 1, 2020
- Messages
- 8,608
- Reaction Score
- 27,670
I hear you, but it could be very possible that the rule changes in the near future. The NCAA caved pretty quickly on the transfer sit out rule after the ruling was made in West Virginia, once other states followed. As this was an individual case, the question to me is whether this gains traction and how quickly.
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2015
- Messages
- 1,494
- Reaction Score
- 7,742
Total garbage and will be yet another genie out of the bottle.Diego Pavia court ruling another potentially massive blow for NCAA — 'It's not going to end until we collectively bargain'
The 30,000-foot view of the Pavia decision: It not only paves the way for all junior college players to gain an additional year, but it may invite even more legal challenges over the NCAA's eligibility rules.
The junior college situation isn't changing just yet. The tweet posted earlier may be misinterpreting a recent court decision. It relates to a QB from Vanderbilt who is challenging the eligibility rule. Currently he's exempt but the rule remains in place for everyone else.
Question is how the NCAA decides to move forward. Do they cave like they have with other court rulings or do they try to fight this?
We've gone from a situation where the students had almost no power to where they frankly have too much. Unlimited transfers, NIL, extra eligibilty on demand, any and all reasons given waivers if remotely challenged.
Granted the NCAA brought much of this on themselves yet the organizations seems content to let things happen while pleading to congress to "do something" when their problems are largely self inflicted.