UCLA has the centers, but what Bruins guard was as good as Clyde? What Bruins forward was as good as Hayes? Carolina of course has the guards, and forwards, but no one who could come close to handling Hakeem.
Clyde was great, and one of the truly underrated superstars ever, but I don't think it's unreasonable to expect Westbrook to surpass him if he keeps playing as he has over the last few years. And by almost every measure Love is a better PF than Hayes, who was a low efficiency player.
UCLA's best is pretty balanced & filthy:
PG: Westbrook
SG: Miller
SF: Johnson
PF: Love
C: KAJ
Then they can bring Goodrich, Vanderweghe, Walton, Baron Davis and Jamaal Wilkes off the bench. (I'm curious to see if LaVine cracks this list eventually as well).
Houston has one big hole:
PG: ???
SG: Clyde
SF: Birdsong
PF: Elvin
C: Hakeem
I guess you could have Don Chaney in the PG spot, but really he was more of a 2 guard who didn't handle the ball. Everything would have to run through Clyde.
Even if we call Kareem vs. Hakeem a wash, and give Clyde the justifiable edge over Reggie, I still think UCLA's 5 best are significantly better than anything the Cougars could claim.
North Carolina isn't as good as I'd expected:
PG: Lawson
SG: Jordan
SF: Carter
PF: McAdoo
C: Daugherty
I'm kind of shocked they never produced a better PG than Lawson (and spoiler alert, but Paige ain't it). Daugherty is largely forgotten now, but for about 6 years -- before the injuries -- he was an All-Star caliber center, and probably would have been a hall of famer if he'd stayed healthy. Hakeem's better, of course, but Daughtery was no scrub, and did just fine against the Dream in their many real life matchups.
I chose McAdoo over Wallace at PF, but I might rethink that.
So again, we'll give Houston the edge at one spot (center), but everything else is UNC.
And here's St. John's:
PG: Jackson
SG: Loughery
SF: Mullin
PF: Artest
C: Wennington
I don't think to me that's three spots (center, PF, SG) to Houston, two (PG, SF) to St. John's.
Basically, my point is, If the BE boosters can expect SJU to become a power again, based on their past, why can't fans of the AAC expect Houston to do the same?
This I agree with. I think the idea should be to recruit Houston & the surrounding area in the way that The U cordoned off southern Florida back in the '80s and '90s -- you knew the best players from there were going to stay local.
It's obviously a big ask for Sampson to pull that off, but there's so much talent coming out of Texas that even a modicum of success could see Houston become a regular NCAA tourney team.