2014 preview from CFN.

[Palatine]

http://cfn.scout.com/2/1413431.html

Some good, some bad, some ignorance.

 

[BlueMAB]

Lyle McCombs prominently featured in the photograph near the headline for the story and shown as one of the top 10 returnees. Article dated 6/21, two weeks after we learned he won't be back.

Do I even bother reading? No credibility for the author(s) even if some of it turns out to be accurate.

 

[huskypantz]

95% of this board is more qualified to write that article on uconn football 2014. And the 5% who isn't doesn't bleed blue.

 

[UCFBfan]

I used to check CFN all the time. Stopped doing it last season when we became part of the AAC and they stopped giving a crap about any team not P5.

 

[DoctorWho85]

It wasn't a terrible write up. There's definitely been worse, but the author really should have checked the facts on Lyle McCombs.

 

[Jimmy Serrano]

I seriously learned absolutely nothing new after reading that. It's almost as if the author combed the BY looking for angles to write about.

I find the Callahan (Andrew?) guy to be the most insightful read. He breaks things down and goes into great detail. He's a good read during the season.

 

[FAIRTIDES]

http://cfn.scout.com/2/1413431.html

Some good, some bad, some ignorance.

Did we finally find the only Sports Writer that didn't attend the CUSE? The following could have been written by a BY'er.

"The disastrous, ill-conceived Paul Pasqualoni experiment is mercifully over,"
"while erasing all memories of Pasqualoni. "