nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 44,967
- Reaction Score
- 35,460
UConn is not getting Danny Hurley. Move on.
UConn is not getting Danny Hurley. Move on.
While Pitt has no NC's, they have a pretty good basketball pedigree; the Jamie Dixon years are not that far removed. I think it's an interesting debate as to which job is better right now - Pitt or UConn.....the ACC or the AAC.... A big question is Pitt's commitment to their program if they are willing to move on from Stallings at this point it would indicate they are ready to re-energize the program which sounds just like us..... One could make the case that Pitt's pedigree goes back further than us if you consider the Billy Knight/Mickey Martin days, the Charles Smith/Jerome Lane days, the Dixon era..... Our pedigree is relatively young if you think about it. I think it would be fun to watch both programs re-boot & get on with it.
Oh good, if nelson says he's not coming here it's confirmed then. Hurley will be the coach.UConn is not getting Danny Hurley. Move on.
Yes. Then again, a similar argument could be made for UConn.Isn't the argument that Pitt prospered off of NYC kids due to the Big East and now that they are in the ACC they've had to change their recruiting base to NC/VA/etc ?
Not really. Under Ollie we got Facey (NY player of the year, top 100 recruit), Samuel (decent 3-star), Larrier (top 40 national recruit), Mamadou (high 3-star/low 4-star), Vital (high 3-star) and Sid Wilson (top 75 national recruit).Yes. Then again, a similar argument could be made for UConn.
The AAC is not a high major and won't be in consideration until/if UConn is the dominant team 4 out of 5 years. We can drag the conference up. Now we drag it down.I couldn’t disagree more.
The stage is commensurate to brand and the UConn basketball brand is much stronger than Pitt.
UConn also has more resources (in terms of brand equity) commensurate to its conference partners than Pitt.
There are levels in every conference and Pitt is not set up to win that conference.
If you don’t think that matters, you’re wrong. UConn has recruited blue chippers in the AAC and has won a Natty in the AAC. The recent tailspin after the coaching shake up doesn’t change those facts.
The AAC is High Major as well, so just get the job done on the court and the rest will follow. The players know they can WIN at UConn and go to the NBA.
Don’t even try to say that winning and tradition doesn’t matter. It does.
JOllie will be the coach next season, get use to it. We're only wasting our time with all these dicussions as to who his replacement will be next season.
I know we've still had success with NY recruiting but my point is that our next coach does not need to be a northeast guy to have success here.Not really. Under Ollie we got Facey (NY player of the year, top 100 recruit), Samuel (decent 3-star), Larrier (top 40 national recruit), Mamadou (high 3-star/low 4-star), Vital (high 3-star) and Sid Wilson (top 75 national recruit).
We haven't been at our best recruiting NYC, but certainly good enough to be at or near the top of the AAC. A competent head coach would have us there.
Isn't the argument that Pitt prospered off of NYC kids due to the Big East and now that they are in the ACC they've had to change their recruiting base to NC/VA/etc ?
I uderstand where you're coming from but they will give him 1 more season after this. The talent on the team he had this season had no chance to succeed. If they were going to make a change it should have been done prior to this season after the mass exodus and failure to secure a commitment from Diallo and MAL.J
I felt exactly as you did until very recently. After a conversation yesterday (sorry, can't name drop) it became clear that KO has to now do something pretty spectacular over the remainder of the season to have a chance at coming back. It doesn't look good in terms of his return.
For the record, this is a considerable change from how things appeared a few weeks back.
Makes one think there oughtta be a northeastern conference. Oh wait...Yes. Then again, a similar argument could be made for UConn.
Ultimately the fact that Hurley is a northeast guy is not super important for either of these jobs. Pitt and UConn are northeast schools in mostly southern conferences.
Ah right, I vaguely remember that guy but his name slips my mind (it was something like "Slice" or w/e), think he ended up on the St. John's staff for a while.They had an assistant that had great contacts in NYC. He left Pitt a year ot two before Dixon left, IIRC. That was the beginning of the end.