Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Alydar, post: 3052400, member: 730"] I agree totally. My comment was about how the committee will see it. Under the current system team A beats team C by 50 points. Then team B beats team C in triple OT by 1. Both teams A & B get exactly the same credit. Or the opposite. Team A loses to C in triple OT. Team B loses to C by 50. Are these 2 losses equivalent? As long as the formula only sees games as wins and losses the rankings will be distorted. There are good losses and bad wins but the quality of play is never a factor in making the 64 or in seeding. [/QUOTE]