It's a conspiracy.Anything besides it being a typo/clerical error is just too silly or petty to even think about.
It's a conspiracy.Anything besides it being a typo/clerical error is just too silly or petty to even think about.
Some sort of "typo" was my first guess also. Either that or it's common knowledge that UConn's home court advantage is 30 points thus we lose by 5 in a neutral setting.Maybe one of the voters just checked a wrong box or something as simple as that.
Or it could be that, like the SEC announcers said, South Carolina showed they are back with their decisive 24-point at-home win against LSU, which is significantly better than their on-the-road 24-point win at LSU earlier in the season. Oh, wait ... never mind.
Could be, because we know the depths she'll stoop to, even including links to remotely related teams like Hartford, Cinci, Temple, and Tufts in her news items just to beef up the list and prolong the time before some of us can actually get down to real work during the day.It was obviously Nan who cast that vote in an attempt to drive hits to the Boneyard. Hits = ad revenue.![]()
One thought was to find a coach without a shred of integrity."
Integrity? Please.
Doubt he really meant it, but okay, here's some Integrity. Not pretty, but as the line goes, "When something needs to be done, you do it." And if you just have to battle the heavy burdens of sanity, responsibility, and integrity, you do it.Just sayin!
Doubt he really meant it, but okay, here's some Integrity. Not pretty, but as the line goes, "When something needs to be done, you do it." And if you just have to battle the heavy burdens of sanity, responsibility, and integrity, you do it.
LOL it mustve come from the SEC ???????????????//
I would guess that the vote came from one of the two teams SC beat since the UConn game... Vandy anyone??? (Maybe they are on a crusade against us.)
As was noted above, the only SEC voter is kristy Curry from Alabama.
OK, but the other part of that was they are 335-15 as the #1. That's called "representing".Maybe this explains it... from ESPN article on last night's game...
"They [UConn] are just 2-1 as the top team this season..."
Cannot handle the pressure of being #1...![]()
The problem with the 2-1 record as #1 is that UConn was #1 virtually all season long save a few weeks after the Stanford loss. Just because the voters stubbornly failed to acknowledge that fact doesn't make it less true. By the time Feb. 9 rolled around, the outcome was expected.Maybe this explains it... from ESPN article on last night's game...
"They [UConn] are just 2-1 as the top team this season..."
Cannot handle the pressure of being #1...![]()
OK, but the other part of that was they are 335-15 as the #1. That's called "representing".