- Joined
- Apr 7, 2015
- Messages
- 9,378
- Reaction Score
- 10,618
That seems like an exaggeration. I know she’s on at least one watch list.She been a disappointment all season. She had such a great freshman season but seem to have regressed since then.
That seems like an exaggeration. I know she’s on at least one watch list.She been a disappointment all season. She had such a great freshman season but seem to have regressed since then.
I think that it is more on reputation than performance. Juhasz only scored 6 points in their win over Maryland.That seems like an exaggeration. I know she’s on at least one watch list.
15.9 ppg and 11.2 rpg, she's terrible.That seems like an exaggeration. I know she’s on at least one watch list.
I think that it is more on reputation than performance. Juhasz only scored 6 points in their win over Maryland.
Her rebounding numbers are really good. So I can't really complain about that. But how can you score 1 point in 37 minutes of play?Who cares about 6 points in 1 game? You really value that over a bigger sample size, like I don't know, her ENTIRE SEASON where she avg a double double?
Oh yeah? A certain team I follow had 4 starters go scoreless today on 0-18 shooting in a combined 97 minutes. Hold my beer as they say.Her rebounding numbers are really good. So I can't really complain about that. But how can you score 1 point in 37 minutes of play?
Oh yeah? A certain team I follow had 4 starters go scoreless today on 0-18 shooting in a combined 97 minutes. Hold my beer as they say.
Her point guard didn't play today, so maybe that changes things. Ohio State had freshman point guard who had not started many games so maybe they do not have the same chemistry. Also sometimes a player can have an off game. Maybe her teammates didn't get her the ball in good spots. Maybe Michigan double teamed her effectively.Her rebounding numbers are really good. So I can't really complain about that. But how can you score 1 point in 37 minutes of play?