- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 7,013
- Reaction Score
- 27,814
They were also better before the loss. The team with a legit post beat them.I don’t think so. Not from what I seen. SC has gotten better since that NC State loss
They were also better before the loss. The team with a legit post beat them.I don’t think so. Not from what I seen. SC has gotten better since that NC State loss
If Kentucky's top 10 then DePaul is top 5.I think you can only move us up, not drop us down despite this final result, but that's just my opinion! Kentucky has gotten better, definitely a Top 10 team imo - possibly 2nd best team in the SEC.
So basically Boston is not a legit post? Ok shadeThey were also better before the loss. The team with a legit post beat them.
Let's just say South Carolina is still in itWho is your top 10 Plebe?
I loved the game, exciting throughout. I thought our defense was fine, Kentucky was lights out from outside and it is hard to beat a team hitting that many 3, but you live by the 3 when they are going in, you die by the 3 when they don’t.Good game. I'm actually pleased with most of the play even though we lost. We improved in turnovers, free throws, and rebounds. The offensive flow looked much improved. Key turnovers and bad decisions at the end did us in along with Rhyne Howard proving why she was the SEC POY last year. I still think we lack some maturity and strong leadership on the court, but I'm hoping that can be developed this year.
Give Kentucky credit. They are a good team that has collected some talent through the transfer portal. We didn't defend the 3, and they made us pay.
Where did I say that? Or even imply that? Actually I was complimenting Boston. But who, other than Kinnane, has Boston matched up against?So basically Boston is not a legit post? Ok shade
Rickea Jackson needs to turn those 10-22 shooting games into 14-16/22 for Mississippi State to be a top ten team.
Howard is so impressive. Truly the total package.
Wait what? Um, 1 game does not a season make...show me a >80 average against P5 opponents and I will grant you a great offensive team but with scores of 62, 63 and 78 (before Overtime) I am not granting them a "great offensive team"....They aren't even a good offensive team yet.MSU is great offensively but IMO they aren't as fundamentally sound defensively under McCray as they were under Vic
They are good (Matharu, Jackson, Carter, and Mingo Young are pretty strong group) but I would say extremely sloppy team offensively at times. A lot of turnovers can be avoided. MSU will have to work to get better on the defensive end. They gave up a lot of wide open 3's vs Kentucky. Got to at least contest the majority of those shots.Wait what? Um, 1 game does not a season make...show me a >80 average against P5 opponents and I will grant you a great offensive team but with scores of 62, 63 and 78 (before Overtime) I am not granting them a "great offensive team"....They aren't even a good offensive team yet.
How many games did the team that scored 90 lose?Some of you guys think that PPG equates to great offense. As a high school coach, I track points per possession. That's a much more telling statistic. I've had teams score 90 points who really didn't play well offensively and teams score 60 that executed like a MOFO and were extremely efficient (few turnovers, few bad shots, etc.).