10 point win was exactly what we needed for NET

[auror]

So you’re saying that a team under .500 with fewer than 10 wins should be in the NCAA Tournament ahead of a team with a 21-1 record? I respectfully and wholeheartedly disagree.

No. "But that all being said, WAB has Winthrop ahead of Penn State (#48 to #65), because consistent winning is hard at any level and should be rewarded."

Penn St being a better team doesn't make it more deserving.

 

[T-Squared]

I was commenting on

No. "But that all being said, WAB has Winthrop ahead of Penn State (#48 to #65), because consistent winning is hard at any level and should be rewarded."

Penn St being a better team doesn't make it more deserving.

I was commenting on NET. I agree with the comment about the WAB rankings because you play the game to win. An under .500 record should never be considered better than a team with a 21-1 record. Ever. I don’t care who they played - they lost.