Nobody needs my idiotic take but, like the rest of you, I still can’t get over it.
I’ve read quite a few posts lamenting that our expectations were too high for this group of players; 4/5 starters were mid-major level recruits and they simply had hard ceilings. All season long, though, I’ve been wondering what a Calhoun could have done with this group of kids. I honestly think he’d have won that last game by 20.
Remember that game in 2008 when UConn suspended Dyson/Wiggins and Calhoun took the severely depleted roster on the road to #8 Indiana and somehow got the W? Of course it’s not fair to compare anyone to Calhoun, but eking out wins like that are a large part of what makes a great coach.
I’m absolutely not defending Ollie, but anytime someone mention’s 2014, the most popular criticism is that he won it all with Calhoun’s recruits.
So my moronic unanswerable question is: Would Hurley have won with that 2014 roster? I really don’t think so. Dude probably would have started Brimah, Nolan and Olander together. (Joking, but you get my point)
I refuse to believe that this season was the best a strategic/reflective coach could have gotten out of these kids.
Anyway, it’s going to be a long off-season but we got this. We managed to stick it out after mind boggling losses to Tulsa in the AAC so this too shall pass. There’s still a lot to like about Hurley even if it is tough to see at the moment.