Recent content by Kgun7

The Stonehill visit will feature the return of former assistant David Berard, now HC at Stonehill.

I'm pretty sure I heard they filled 2006 applications last year! Your wait may finally be over!!

I got my deposit back .... I should have stayed on the list. My 2012 application is probably years away from being filled ...

USA Welcomes Turkiye on June 7 2025 in East Hartford

Pretty sure it was Diaco that instructed every punt to be a fair catch and no attempt at a return.

Gresh was trying very hard to convince the refs it was offensive pass interference. Almost sounded like he had a gripe against CT and UConn in general ... Bad look for a color commentator. Even tried to call the UConn punt return unit for a penalty, that was clearly called on Umass. Dude has a...

Bought a 2022 F150 Lariat Crew Cab. 10 speed tranny knocks, and AC has freezing issues ... Other than that, love it!! It seriously is a luxury SUV with a 6.5 foot bed.

The bidding that will go on? Or ... the bidding that has always gone on?? If John Wooden and Bear Bryant had no problem with funneling cash towards talent that they sought out and out bid their competition for, why should Jim Mora?? I believe NIL is just a new, different instrument to play...

What Brett Berard recall from AHL Hartford means for Rangers - Forever Blueshirts

There's a lot of college QB's taking some pretty big hits thanks to Kenny Pickett and his fake slide.

Even better was the way Fagnano moved in the pocket to extend the play. The Mike backer blitzes becoming the 5th rusher and gets by Murawski. Fagnano didn't panic and side steps him, moving to his left to extend the play. That was a very difficult throw moving to his left and not really being...

Could not agree more with #3. Analytics be damned ... Does Penders realize what message he is sending his team by bunting his clean up hitter in that situation?? Absolutely not a team confidence building decision.

I definitely appreciate it all! Thanks to everyone who puts in the effort!

Questioning a ref's judgement on a holding or pass interference call is subjective and up for debate. Adding a 2nd review, to a play that was already reviewed and decided, is a complete abuse of the rules. That's not paranoia or fanaticism. That's a blatant attempt to influence the outcome of...

We can debate the merits of the targeting call all day long. A lot of that is left to referee and officials interpretation. I can live with a referee's opinion, no matter how questionable it is. That judgement is well within their purview. What is NOT subject to interpretation is a 2nd review...